The gym denied it, because the fitness coach had left, and these 50 classes may have been promised to the woman by the fitness coach himself, not by the gym. When we go to the gym, we often meet fitness instructors to recommend personal education to us. If you can exercise, you generally don't buy personal education. If you can't exercise, you can consider buying a private tutor. This woman bought a private lesson from a fitness instructor because she couldn't keep fit. At the time of purchase, the fitness instructor promised that she could take 50 classes, but in fact their contract only marked 23 classes. But the fitness coach said that he gave the woman a preferential price and that it had been approved by the superior.

In other words, this is not a private commitment of the fitness instructor. What the woman didn't expect was that the fitness instructor left here later. The woman was worried that her course could not continue, so she found this gym. At first, the staff agreed to let the woman attend, but later she changed her mind, from agreeing to only 30 classes, and finally became only 23 private classes on the contract. From verse 50 to verse 23, this result is unacceptable to women.

So the woman reflected this matter to the market supervision department, but in the end, this matter was not handled well, because the other party's attitude became very tough and the woman was allowed to go through legal procedures directly. The change of the other party's attitude is also because the previous negotiation process between the two sides was not smooth. In my opinion, since the fitness instructor has been recognized by the superior, then this matter should be regarded as the commitment of the gym to this woman. Although the fitness coach has left, the gym must fulfill its promise, otherwise it will be considered as a promise by others.

This situation is not good for this woman, nor for the gym. For the sake of her reputation, the gym should also fulfill its original promise. Litigation is not what both sides want to see. After all, if you go to court, it takes a long process to deal with things. Fitness can't be stopped for a long time. Once we stop, our previous efforts may be in vain. And I think this woman will not be particularly happy even if she finally gets the result she wants through legal channels, because in this way, she will offend all the staff in this gym, and the gym fitness may not be treated with special enthusiasm, which will also make this woman unhappy. So I suggest that this woman go directly to the court for a refund and change to a gym.