Are all the big guys trained in the gym really "beautiful but useless" as they say? Personally, I don't think the person who said this is a bricklayer or a bodybuilder.
I remember a friend who was a sports student with five big and three thick. He is still in college and working during the summer vacation. Because of the urgent need, he went to the construction site to push bricks, thinking that he had a hand, so he worked hard. The result was beyond his expectation. After going back and forth several times, he is almost exhausted. It is better to work with the thin old man quickly. At that time, he wondered if there was something wrong with him.
Why is the muscle gap between muscle man and brick mover so big? First of all, they are not from the same world. To tell the truth, why do brick movers move bricks? This is neither valuable for learning nor a coolie. Nature is for living, and of course there is nothing they can do. There is no doubt that the brick movers have really strong endurance. It takes three or four hours at most to go to the gym and lift the iron, but it may take eight hours or even ten hours to move bricks. In the long run, strength and endurance are naturally very good.
However, the muscles trained by fitness are not as weak as some netizens say. The muscle strength and endurance of normal training are also considerable, with aesthetic feeling and certain explosive force. When it comes to explosive power, suppose a big muscle confronts a carefully selected brick mover, and the brick mover may not be able to gain the upper hand in a short time, but compared with endurance, the muscular man seems to be a little overwhelmed. There is an essential difference between the two.
In contrast, brick movers are more powerful. They used their own flesh and blood and sweat to build tall buildings for us to live, exercise and work. Brick movers are not as muscular as bodybuilders, but they like to be compared.
If you really want to tell a winner, who do you think is stronger?