Is Nikon D750 suitable for Ma art35 1.4 or 50 1.4 lens? I have the opinion that if you like portrait photography very much, then both shots are worth having.
These are two non-overlapping shots, each with its own advantages and advantages.
Sigma's black technology art series, as we all know, is of good quality and trustworthy lens. Of course, 35/ 1.4 is also a very good shot. This kind of lens is most suitable for shooting portraits in the environment or folk customs, which can not only capture the well-structured subject, but also properly explain the environment.
In addition, this lens is the first choice for indoor portrait shooting, and the focal length is just right when shooting indoors. In addition, the aperture of this lens is relatively large, which can improve the film yield in the case of slightly insufficient light.
Of course, the 50 lens is also a very good lens, which is what we often call the opening title. It is most suitable for shooting busts and portraits. Because of its large aperture, the background blur is also quite good. The sharpness of the lens is good, and the color reproduction is also quite powerful. It is also trustworthy.
Generally speaking, the choice of lens should be related to the portrait subject you like to shoot. If two people like shooting, then these two shots can be owned at the same time.
The above is my opinion, welcome friends to add.
Sword dance images, western photographers, welcome to pay attention.
Nikon d750 is a classic entry-level Quan Huafu SLR camera, which lasts for a long time. It is Nikon's most sold SLR camera. Although d780 was released late, many photographers still have a soft spot for d750. Now SLR gives way to micro-camera. I don't know if this SLR camera is still available, but for many photographers, d750 is still the main camera in their hands and is still widely used. I often see them shooting with d750.
The two kinds of lenses mentioned in the question are basically commonly used lenses, each with its own characteristics. 50 1.4 is a traditional lens. It's good to take a big head photo and a chest photo, but the picture quality is poor when taking a full-length photo. However, it is still very good to take a full-length portrait at 35 1.4, whether it is Stone Horse or Longteng. If you usually like to take portraits in the environment or indoors, then I suggest you adapt to Ma 35- 1.4. If you often take headshots or busts, it is also a good choice to match 50- 1.4 directly.
First of all, regarding Sigma lens, art lens is an excellent lens, and Art 35 and Art 50 are very popular fixed Jiao Da aperture lenses. Excellent workmanship, excellent image quality, especially under the maximum aperture, there is still good sharpness. Both shots can take a good portrait.
Regarding the focal length selection of these two lenses, the focus is still on the distinction of lens angles.
35mm perspective 35mm perspective is a classic humanistic perspective that we often say, because it is still a small wide angle, and it is easy to shoot the background when shooting people. The large aperture of f/ 1.4 can also have a good blur effect when taking portrait photos. If you like to take portraits of the environment and some scenery photos, choose this lens.
50mm angle of view 50mm angle of view is similar to our monocular angle of view, which belongs to a focal segment connecting the preceding with the following. The downward direction is wide angle, and the upward direction is telephoto. With a 50mm lens and a large aperture, you can take a half-length photo of a person with a strong sense of blur, and taking a full-length photo of a person may be two steps backwards than 35. The feature of this focal segment is that the lens distortion is not obvious and the photos taken are very peaceful. This sense of peace is like boiled water, which tastes tasteless, but the more you use it, the more you like it.
Select two focal lengths. Personally, it depends on your preference. If you prefer the environment, choose 35. If you select more characters, select 50. I recommend that you take a 24-70 shot for a period of time and then play it back in the computer to see if it is more than 35 focal length or more than 50 focal length. In fact, the prices of these two lenses of Sigma are not high. If it's really tangled, you might as well buy both.
I have used Sigma art35 1.4 and Nikon 50 1.4 lenses. All good marksmanship. How to choose?
Let's take a look at Sigma's 35MM 1.4, 35MM focal length, and standard humanistic photography perspective. Sigma's lens size is not small, and the art series is also housekeeping quality. The 35MM viewing angle can better explain the environment. It is a good lens for environmental portraits and environmental humanities.
Nikon's 50MM 1.4 is small in size, good in quality and reasonable in price. The focal length of 50MM is too classic, and it is a sharp weapon for shooting busts.
Both lenses have a large aperture of 1.4, which can better blur the background and improve the shutter speed in the case of insufficient light. If you are shooting environmental and humanistic works, then go to 35MM F 1.4 by Sima. If you like busts, the background blur is better, and 50MM 1.4 is a good choice!
There is really no way to answer you directly.
Both shots are good shots. But it's all human shots. The so-called "humanistic lens", my personal understanding, the FOV of the perspective is either too big or too small, which is not easy to grasp. The scenery is not wide enough, and it is easy to cause perspective deformation.
Personally, I have never advised novices to buy it casually. But the one who uses D750 should be an experienced photographer. Whether 35 is good or 50 is good, you should be qualified and have the ability to decide for yourself. Don't answer!
As for the purpose of taking portraits, it is best to consider the lens within the range of 85- 135 mm, 50mm is a little reluctant, and 35 mm is even more reluctant.
I tried to answer you, no matter right or wrong, please forgive me.
When I first entered 50 1.8D, it was because of money. At that time, I just wanted to have a fixed focus, so I gave up 1.4G, but the head was extremely light and small. The bad thing is that this head is a D head, the focusing action is a bit too big, and there will be thugs. You can't shoot with a small aperture backlight. There is a regular polygon with a big blue dot in the middle.
Besides, 35 mm, that was a few months ago. At that time, I was also confused whether it was the original factory 1.8 or Sima 1.4. There is a difference of 1000 yuan between the two. I am talking about the second-hand price. Why not go to the original factory 1.4? Money is burning.
I have a phobia of choice, which is not difficult to find later. First of all, you have to know what you bought it for. I think so, too. I bought 35 street beats. Well, that's the purpose. A purpose depends on the conditions. Street shooting, don't be too scary, including your own clothes. As for the camera, the lower the profile, the better. Of course, it would be better to take Leica to the street to shoot.
By low-key, I mean light and small. After all, you have to take your camera with you all day, which is the first. The second is small and unobtrusive. Lightweight, so that you can carry your back out at any time without getting bored; Small is not annoying. At this point, it is obvious that the horse will brush down. To put it more tritely, "it is said" only means that this horse can lick the child. I see. If you decide, you won't be entangled. Enter 351.8g ED..
Now, it's okay that you can easily hold 750+351.8g ED+501.8d in a bag when you go out.
So I went out to take pictures, and I was as eager as I wanted. The above story is not a story, but I hope it will help you.
In short, the starting point of equipment selection is that you need to know what you want to shoot.
The difference between a 35mm fixed-focus lens and a 50mm fixed-focus lens is that the focal lengths of the two lenses are different, so the viewing angles are different. The viewing angle of 35mm lens is about 63 degrees, and that of 50mm lens is about 46 degrees. Although the focal length is different, the difference is only 15mm, and the viewing angle is only 17 degrees. The difference is not very big. Different focal lengths (viewing angles) of lenses have different effects on photography and imaging. 1. With the camera position unchanged, the shorter the focal length, the wider the range of the scene, the smaller the subject and the stronger the sense of depth. The longer the focal length, the greater the degree of reaction. 2. Shooting subjects of the same size, the shorter the focal length, the more forward the camera, the more obvious the distance and the stronger the perspective. It is easy to deform when taking portraits. The longer the focal length, the greater the degree of reaction. 3. Other things being equal, the shorter the focal length, the greater the depth of field, the easier it is to keep the foreground and background clear, and the worse the background blur effect. The longer the focal length, the shallower the depth of field, and the easier it is to blur the background. As for the 35mm and 50mm fixed-focus lenses, although the focal lengths are different, there is little difference, so the above influence exists, but it is not obvious. Bresson's 50 Daido Moriyama's 35 Koldeka's 2535 can explain more environmental elements, and 50 is more focused on close-ups. Pay attention to the combination of environment and people, and pay attention to people over 50. 35 pays more attention to "recording" and 50 pays more attention to "seeing". (This is not what I said, Bresson said) My personal experience is that 25, 28, 35 is documentary and 50 is humanities. Humanism takes people as the theme, and documentaries take environment, scenery and still life as the theme. Documentary about local environment 25 or 28, documentary about local still life or scenery and people 35, documentary about scenery and people 50. The conclusion is: 35 is "remember the scenery" and 50 is "look at people". Imagine a scene where you photograph a person standing on the edge of a desolate city, facing the pollution of the distant city and the withered trees around him. If you take a picture of this person's back and want to show that people are in a realistic polluted environment, then use 35, because you are showing this environment; If you want to show people's helplessness and disappointment with the environment, use 50, because you are showing this person. 35 and 50 are the two most classic focal segments, and they cannot replace each other. Personally, I feel that I will use 35 a day a little more, and I will use 50 when I pay more attention to people. Generally, photographers rarely see "people" from "scenery", and telling stories through photos mostly depends on the scenery, so many people use 35 more, but think 50 is moderate. That's just because we haven't reached that level yet. A high level of photography ultimately depends on "scenery" and "people", so few people use 50 well, and once they use it well, they are masters. On the contrary, 35 is used well because it is simple. Therefore, Daido Moriyama has always advocated that "photography is a simple record" and Bresson is a "decisive moment", which is the difference between "recording" and "close-up". Not to say that it is good, to see the scenery or people. Finally, I want to add: If you shoot a group of people and show the state of a group of people, it takes 50 to feature someone and 35 to show the whole. Because it also involves the relationship between the whole and the parts. Strictly speaking, I am opposed to shooting sugar water tablets with a fixed focal length of 35 and 50, which undermines the original intention of these two focal lengths. People who shoot sugar water or commercial photography should use zoom.
I matched the horse's 35+50+85.
In the end, 35 and 50 were changed to 24-70, because you are too lazy to change the lens, and there is always only one head, with a 70% hang-up rate. And then more than two heads. There must be something that is rarely used,
Depends on what you shoot.
Because 35 1.4 has a wider field of vision and can contain more scenes, it is the best lens for shooting humanities documentaries. Of course, you can also take pictures of the scenery. And 50 1.4 is more suitable for taking portraits.