I clicked in to have a look, and the report was as follows: A8L rushed to 120 km/h at the airport road with a speed limit of 80km/h, and suddenly lost control. Cleisthenes? After hitting the middle isolation guardrail, it quickly hit the Toyota car in the opposite lane. Between crackles, Toyota cars can't escape. Directly hit and bounced and rushed to the next lane, and the Nissan car driving in the next lane failed to brake and directly hit the tail of the Toyota car. As a result, after hitting the middle guardrail at a corner, it collided with a Toyota car, causing the couple in the Toyota car to die unfortunately.
Let's analyze it. I checked. This Toyota is Lei Ling. We can compare the body lines and wheel styles:
This configuration: the terminal price is 654.38+ 10,000 RMB.
The score of C-NCAP is 59.2 (out of 62), which is an appropriate five-star safety standard. Just the reliability of this mechanism. I don't understand, so I can't evaluate. At least I can make a reference.
I went to the authoritative E-NCAP to check the score of Corolla (Lei Ling is its essence):
Still a five-star score, in short, the safety is very high. In addition, the collision result of Audi A8L was not found, but as a luxury car with a mid-range price of 677,700 yuan and a popular brand like Audi, its safety is beyond doubt.
Let me tell you what to think:
2. The contingency of the actual situation. For example, a lovely girl and a 200-pound fitness man, I don't need to say who is more powerful in their fight. But if a girl kicks a strong man in the crotch with hard high heels, who do you think will be hurt? Accidents will also happen, and the strength of different parts of the car body is also different. For example, if you hit the front, there will be a long energy absorption area, while if you hit the front and side with a small angle, the stress space will be much smaller. When it comes to collisions in real life, the situation is even different. Brother Che has never seen100000 Ford Forex, and broke a million-class Land Rover. Not to mention 65438+ million KIA K3, directly put 3.5 million? Armored vehicle? George patton's leg was amputated. So a single case can't explain who is safe and who is not.
3. Is the car weight related to safety? The initiator of this view, some people say, is the public relations team. There is even a saying that the weight of the car will run stably, the Japanese will be light, and it will float when running. What I don't understand is, who is more important than Volkswagen and some Japanese brands with the same price, the same level and the same model, won't they check online? Still too lazy? Or are you afraid of breaking your own cognition? Can only say ignorance, I will try, check and post a picture:
Passat and Camry, also the latest and lowest, see who is heavier. Look at the top match (note that Camry is a fuel version, and there is nothing like a hybrid version with batteries):
The car accident was badly damaged, so it may be safer. On the other hand, some cars are not seriously damaged in traffic accidents and may be unsafe. For example, old Pu Sang, that guy, usually didn't deform during the collision, but it was more serious, and everyone had to squeeze to death.
This is a typical old design, which is no longer working now.
Because the suv center is high, it may roll over, which is hard to say. The last blessing is still worthy of recognition. This yard is a yard.
What car is safer? First of all, you should have a sense of safe driving, fasten your seat belt and get used to defensive posture. That's all that matters. If something really happens, it is not necessarily a result. Secondly, in terms of automobiles, there is a general rule that the newly designed automobile safety structure is more reasonable than the old ones, that is, safer. In other words, if you can buy a higher-end car, you can buy a higher-end car; If you can buy something more expensive, buy something more expensive (not the configuration, but the model). If you can buy mainstream brands, don't buy non-mainstream brands. The sales of mainstream brands are enough to support R&D expenses. If you can buy a global model, don't buy a special contribution. Many other countries have higher collision safety standards. In addition, if you want to know the collision results of domestic cars, you can refer to CIASI of China Insurance Company. At present, it may have strong credibility. After all, it is the insurance company's supervision of car companies. If the safety of the car is poor, the premium will increase. Is it the opposite of car companies, or is it more valuable than CNCAP?