It depends on which aspect is dominant, such as flexibility. It can be seen from playing basketball that there will be different divisions between height and physique. The big skeleton plays the center, dribbles the ball to hit people and grab rebounds, and the small skeleton generally plays the defender, and flexibly dribbles the ball to control the whole court.

In terms of fitness and muscle training, the size of the skeleton is different. If a person has a big skeleton, then a good figure that needs exercise must increase muscle content to look harmonious, while a small skeleton is the opposite. This can be seen from the biceps brachii. A short humerus needs a small amount of muscle, and the same amount of muscle looks great, while a large skeleton needs more exercise to increase the muscles to the same size. However, if everyone has a lot of muscle mass, a big skeleton will have an advantage over a small skeleton. The large skeleton proves that in the same environment, there is more room for muscle growth and the ceiling of muscle content is higher, which is the advantage comparison of sports performance.

In the process of movement, if the big skeleton does the same action, the trajectory will be longer, the greater the consumption, the more work will be done. Therefore, it is easier for small skeletons to use barbells or dumbbells with the same weight, so there are almost no tall weightlifters.

Therefore, the big skeleton is not necessarily more dominant than the small skeleton in sports. It can only be said that these two constitutions have their own advantages. The most important thing is not how powerful a thing is, but how powerful you can use it.