Current location - Health Preservation Learning Network - Slimming men and women - Many anchors in fighting fish are sprayed with two sentences to stop the audience from talking. Is it suitable for live broadcast?
Many anchors in fighting fish are sprayed with two sentences to stop the audience from talking. Is it suitable for live broadcast?
In the betta live broadcast room, many anchors were scolded and blocked the audience's speech. These people are not fit to be anchors. First of all, I'm not the anchor. I want to analyze whether these people can be anchors from objective reasons.

High quality is not to spray.

First of all, the quality of a network anchor is the most important, but you can't ask for it except the quality. All anchors are the best, so for example, the anchor is broadcasting his game live. It may be because of technical reasons that he is not skilled in the operation of this hero, but it may also be that his other heroes are good at the operation, or he is not good at this position at present, so he doesn't play well. Then the audience will spray him. If he is a qualified network anchor, this hero. I think a person with basic moral qualities will think that he can't spray, right? But blocking him, other viewers must feel uncomfortable. I don't think there is anything wrong with shielding him. Don't you come to watch the audience not to watch the live broadcast, but to watch the fight? If it's a fight, why not go to see wcg? So I think it's normal for the network anchor to turn off. I think normal people will use this behavior to reply to these online sprays.

Shielding is not disrespect.

Then do you think blocking these viewers is disrespectful to these viewers, but are these viewers showing respect to the anchor? I don't think we should do anything with our hobbies. A person who really wants moral justice should think about it from the standpoint of others. Listening to people blocking you, I think it's an anchor with high moral quality. You spray others, and others spray with you, which shows that you are both poor in quality. So I think it's normal for network anchors to block these viewers. I ask this question. I don't know from which angle you ask this question. If you think someone is blocking you, you think this person is not suitable for being a network anchor. Is it the only way to be a network anchor?

Transposition consideration

I don't know what the person who asked the audience this question was thinking. Maybe he stands in the audience's position, but he shouldn't stand in the audience's position and spray people at will. Besides, with so many people in China, what is the maximum? Internet keyboard players spray most online, and most of these online sprays are brainless. Is it necessary to say that loving someone needs a reason? So we answered him, do you need a reason to spray people? I think these online sprayers and keyboard players have such an answer, that is, they don't need it, that is, they spray it until you doubt your life, so the online anchor blocks the audience's comments. I think it is to restore a harmonious environment for this network, because I am a graduate student, and I know that the latest national regulation is the network, not a place outside the law. The network needs a harmonious society, and the network world also stresses the rule of law and morality.

So whether these people can be anchors is not because they block the audience's speech, but because they don't adapt to the network environment. If they are not suitable for the network environment, then they will naturally quit. If they are drinking this online environment, then they are not worthy to be anchors.