First, the starting point is good, but it is divorced from reality.
The starting point of advocating vegetarianism is good, but many ordinary people in their society are keen on eating meat. They don't eat meat at every meal. They also need vegetarian food. So it is difficult for ordinary people to be vegetarian all the time. They advocate vegetarianism, which is unrealistic in my opinion. They don't look at it from the perspective of ordinary people. For ordinary people, every meal can be accompanied by vegetarian food, which is the best life, so they will not pursue vegetarian food. The happiness of ordinary people is to eat a good meal and a big meal.
Second, the combination of meat and vegetables is the best partner.
Vegetarians, they are vegetarians all the year round, please check your index to make your weight and figure smaller, but for ordinary people, most of us pursue a combination of vegetarianism and vegetarianism. The combination of vegetarians and vegetarians can not only make us healthy, but also bring us happiness in taste buds. If we are only vegetarian, it will also do harm to a person's health, and vegetarians can't fully supplement the nutrients needed by the body. Medical scientists have also shown through research that the combination of meat and vegetables is beneficial to the development of the body.
Third, everyone has his own happiness.
Some people are happy to be vegetarian, while others are happy to eat meat. We can't say who is right or wrong. It can only be said that everyone has his own rights and is happy to choose what to eat. Hong Tao, Zhang Jingchu and others advocate eating hands, and their starting point is good. They hope to reduce some hypertension diseases through vegetarianism, but ignore that some people just like to eat meat. They are keen on the combination of vegetarianism and vegetarianism to make them healthy and bring them happiness on the tip of their tongue. So I only listen to what they preach about vegetarianism and don't accept it.