The hardware of Xiaomi 10 and Xiaomi 10 Pro are basically the same, and the shrinkage is not too serious. The rear four-shot removes the 8-megapixel telephoto lens and the1200,000-pixel portrait lens, and changes it to a 2-megapixel macro and a 2-megapixel depth of field. The 65438+ 1 billion pixel 8P lens was also replaced by 7P, and 50W was quickly charged to 30W. Everything else is fine. The only thing that worries netizens is the screen. Xiaomi 10 and 10 Pro both use customized Samsung curved perforated screens, and they also need to support domestic screen factories. In the future, they will join the screen of Huaxing Optoelectronics, which means that Xiaomi 10 will mix screens, so they have to grab the first round in order not to draw lots.
What is the performance of Xiaomi 10? Look at the comments of the first batch of users.
Netizens conducted a screen test on the newly acquired Xiaomi 10, and "CSOT" appeared on the screen, which is the abbreviation of Huaxing Optoelectronics, which means that the first batch of Xiaomi 10 also had Huaxing Optoelectronics screens, not all of which were Samsung screens mentioned by Xiaomi executives. The netizen expressed disappointment and was afraid of drawing lots to grab the first round. As a result, he bought Huaxing Screen.
Samsung AMOLED screen is the best mobile phone screen in the world, and Xiaomi 10 is specially customized for high-end display. It is understandable that netizens want to buy a Samsung screen. In fact, the arrangement of AMOLED pixels of Huaxing Optoelectronics is similar to that of Samsung screen. As long as the display effect is excellent, there is really no need to entangle this point.
The JD.COM evaluation number of Xiaomi 10 is 1700+, with a favorable rate of 97% and more than 30 medium-poor evaluations. It is surprising that the number of bad reviews exceeds the normal level. After the listing of Redmi k20 Pro, the favorable rate remained above 98% for a long time.
The praise is almost the same: the screen is great, the operation is smooth, and the fluency brought by the 90Hz refresh rate is indeed smoother than that of ordinary mobile phones. Large battery, strong endurance, 25% power consumption in 4 hours and fast charging speed. The most satisfactory thing is to release it to the outside world and kill all mobile phones. Strong performance, eating chicken without any problems, fever is not obvious.
Shortcomings are also obvious, mainly in the following points:
Without the amazing feeling that a high-end flagship should have, or the feeling of being bright at the moment, it is an ordinary flagship mobile phone. This may be the last evaluation that Lei Jun wants to see.
The photo effect is disappointing, and 1 100 million pixels will still pause. It seems that Snapdragon 865' s support for 1 100 million pixels is not perfect. Slow motion will have a mosaic-like picture, which is unbearable.
System optimization is not in place. The netizen said that it was the first time to shut down four times and automatically restart four times. It took Xiaomi six years to do this.
The workmanship is not fine enough to meet the standard of high-end flagship, and there are many small problems. In fact, these are all understandable. There must be a first time for everything, and the success of Huawei's high-end flagship is not a slap in the face.