I think the combination on the court is mainly offensive. After all, there are many forwards who attack more than 160 in the league. So Zha, Du, Melon, Wade, Granger, anyway, you have to look at the league scoring list, the top few are the people you want, and so on. These combinations should not let you down.
As for the point guard, I think the assists must be strong, and we can't use those swingers as point guards. Although their attack is strong, if SG and SF are strong enough, they need someone to pass the ball to them at the back. If the point guard scores too much, it will reduce the scores of SG and SF. I know that myself. For a while, I let Ross play point guard. Although he often scored 20 points, one of SG and SF points was always iron, so I fired him. I strongly recommend Paul (the only S+ player in the league) and Deron as point guards. Both of them are defenders, with strong assists and good rebounds. As for Rondo, I don't like it very much and I haven't used it.
Some people say that it doesn't matter if you can't form such a lineup. Can be combined according to this idea. If you can't find an S-level player, find an A-level player and match the position according to his data ability.
With this lineup, we can practice the corresponding tactics. Many friends practice tactics without looking at them carefully, so they practice casually. In fact, every tactic has a detailed position description. Players must read every tactical instruction carefully. Many friends practice tactics without watching, and the actual combat is still a mess. For example, the eagle's tactic is to play singles for C and PF, so people in this position must score better, otherwise the tactical power will not be exerted. For example, interior coordination requires the organizational ability of C and PF, so people in these two positions should have strong assists. Therefore, tactics should not be practiced blindly, and targeted training should be carried out in combination with people in their own lineup. After the revision, it is found that the interpretation of tactics has also changed greatly. For example, some tactics are effective restraint, some tactics are cracking, and some tactics are effective. Personally, I think cracking, effective restraint, remarkable effect and good effect. In short, I think practicing tactics should be combined with my own personnel. For example, if I have a strong attack group, then I will start with the eagle attack. If there is a strong inside attack, let's start with a strong inside attack. In actual combat, we will meet some players who often change tactics. I think we should stick to the principle of playing with me at this time. You don't have to follow the conversion. The victory of the game is not necessarily won by changing tactics.
Finally, I want to say that the lineup should not be changed frequently, not only the tactical proficiency will drop, but also the X factor of the game will drop, just like I lost in the first few games after the substitution of my main lineup. Therefore, the lineup must remain stable. Sometimes losing is losing. Don't think about changing people. Keep it. I wrote a lot of books and shared my experience in playing games with a 30-year-old man like you. I hope everyone will criticize and give directions. Finally, I hope we can all become good friends in this game, regardless of age, regardless of age!