This fact tells us that the revolutionary substitution of "electrification" should not exist in the end.
New forces in building cars? There are many signs of the car in front, which should be known to everyone and easy to find. What you don't know may be the reason-why you can't do it anymore.
Remember the reason given here-it's been too long, why? The market does not admit that there is no advanced substitute in technology.
Such technology may be a supplement to a market segment of traditional car companies, and there is no problem.
Carbon and oxygen are very important. They are essential elements for biology, organic matter and circulation. Trees absorb carbon dioxide and release oxygen, while people inhale oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide.
Trees are hundreds of feet high, and the fallen leaves return to their roots. This is an understandable cycle. However, I don't know what the direct theory is to try to completely eliminate it.
What qualifications does the new car-making force have to compete with the traditional OEM?
Even Tesla, do you ask questions?
This is the quality of assembly, so I dare to challenge the traditional OEM.
Even if it is a niche manufacturer Mazda, the ridicule is really full of firepower.
What did Mazda say? The battery life of an electric car is 200 kilometers, which allows you to go to work from home. Mazda also made a PPT to ask everyone, why should we say that environmental protection is zero pollution?
How many new forces fled in the first half of the year alone? The one who will return to China next week hasn't come back today. Wang Xiaolin's air tickets are hard to get, so Steve Lindsay, who is with him, will sue the China joint venture and push for sanctions. It really works. It's hard to understand.
The new force of building a car burned 8.4 billion yuan and could not make a mass production car. How many Koenigsegg sports cars did they buy instead?
If you want to buy a car, you can't buy anything except the red flag L5, and you need approval.
Traditional OEM bench test, three high test, engineers give you conscience to test the life of door handles.
Do you know how dumbfounded it is that Weibo boss Wang Gaofei's car can't play with the hidden handle? I am proud of the new car-making forces OTA, Weilai Chang' an Avenue Pawo, and Tesla Black Screen, which can be counted as a bunch.
There are also new forces to build cars and full-screen instruments. As a result, the blue screen suddenly turned black when driving, so the driver slowly drove to the side of the road and waited for rescue.
What's so hard about pure electricity?
Charging, plus power battery, can turn oil into electricity, pure electric platform, you see how professional Chevrolet is.
The platform is flat and the car is comfortable.
He still looks very handsome. What do you think of the new forces of building cars?
It's not a day or two since the new forces made jokes.
Hundreds of reversing radars need OTA, and a car with tens of thousands of dollars can do the reversing radar well.
What do you need to do to build a new army?
How many car jokes have been contributed by spontaneous combustion and fire all day.
I suggest you carefully consider the new forces of building cars.
Traditional OEM BYD is cheap and PHEV is expensive.
The new forces of making cars are simply not qualified to be compared with traditional car companies.
All new electric vehicle brands are the last ones to stand out. Without the restrictions on purchases in some cities, subsidies from the state and local governments, and blind choices by consumers who don't understand cars, there is no way out.
Traditional car companies have the mature technology, platform and resource matching ability of fuel vehicles, as well as the continuous profitability support of fuel vehicles, which can withstand the longer-term market cultivation process.
Whether it is Evergrande, which seems to have deep pockets, Weilai and Tucki, which still have strong ability to attract gold, even Tesla, the world's first electric vehicle brand, can hardly shake the position of traditional car companies.
However, the market needs diversity, because the new forces do not have too many historical burdens, and because they are all facing the dilemma of life and death and have a stronger desire to survive. The models they produce are often eye-catching and easy to seduce young consumers who don't understand cars.
The waves behind the Yangtze River push the waves ahead, and each generation is stronger than the next.
Unlike mobile phones, the new force of building cars has a low technical threshold, while smart computers only need to be miniaturized. . . . Cars, on the other hand, are fixed in size and have a series of cognition such as daily power life, reliability and handling. It can be said that none of the three technical fields of engine, gearbox and chassis can be avoided. . . That is to say, the location depth is too strong and irregular, but it can still be divided into three or six categories in this industry. Therefore, in the case of adopting the traditional automobile concept, it is inevitable to talk about new forces. . The only hope of the new forces lies in the three-dimensional traffic flying at ultra-low altitude, but it is still early, and now there is no chance without clear resource control.
Cars are the epitome of modern industrial manufacturing, and it is not as simple as spending tens of thousands of dollars to buy fans to become online celebrities.
Think about it, this thing has developed for so long for more than 100 years. How many manufacturers can you count today?
Yes, the threshold for making this product is actually very high. Those models with batteries, motors and car shells on the road are short-lived after all, and will not last long. Why? Because there is no precipitation made by machinery, there will be no good products.
There's a documentary called "A Hundred Years' History of Cars", and you can go to Mile Mile to see it.
Also, your title is too instructive. When does the tram need a petrol car to figure out how to fight back? At least this statement doesn't exist at present, and it may exist in the future, but it is also a matter of course for major automobile manufacturers, and it is by no means a new enterprise that can be run well by financing.
The biggest advantage of traditional car-making enterprises is their strong strength and mature technology. But the biggest drawback is this. The tail is too big to fall, it is difficult to transform, and it can't bear the vested interests. There is no determination for a strong man to break his wrist. The new forces that build cars have no historical burdens and no retreat. Only by continuous innovation can they survive. Who do you think will win?
The new car-making forces are playing the market to cheat money, but they are playing.
Tesla, a new force, has a good future, but people mainly study spacecraft and rockets.
As for the car companies that appeared in China in the past year or two or even a few months ago, not to mention.
Anyone with brains can see that the new forces are cheating subsidies, idiots and money.