Recently, a case in Chongqing has attracted the attention of many netizens. This case was originally told to buy fake goods, and then sued the seller for compensation of 50 thousand yuan, that is, bought at that time? Three no products? Five times the price, the court won the plaintiff's case in the first instance and the second instance, which shows that it can be done from a legal point of view. After all, this is not the buyer's responsibility, but the seller's fault, but this case is not very reasonable from a humanitarian point of view.

First of all, the defendant in this case is an old lady. She hand-made braised pork with Tujia cuisine in rural areas, and the plaintiff bought three copies for the first time. At that time, it should have been found that there was no certificate, health permit or business license. This is a typical three-no product, but the buyer bought a copy of One Happy and Fifty. After receiving the goods, he sued the seller and got compensation.

Secondly, just because the defendant is an old lady this time, if a large supermarket sells expired food or three-no products, and consumers still buy and sue the supermarket or merchant knowing that it is expired, people may not think that the buyer is immoral. After all, taking inventory is the responsibility and obligation of a supermarket. If the supermarket itself doesn't know about the products, how many consumers will buy three-no products or expired food, and then they don't know who to turn to if there is a problem.

Finally, the old lady doesn't have proper documents, which is actually different from street stalls. We can see everything on the street stalls, and now most of them have special booths. Their business is permitted by law and the state. Many people sell things on the spot, so there is no so-called receipt or receipt, so there is generally no problem. Online shopping must have proof, and the seller himself does the same.