Current location - Health Preservation Learning Network - Slimming men and women - Is Jin Fu Fund a Fraud Platform?
Is Jin Fu Fund a Fraud Platform?
It's a fraud company, cheating on the grounds of defrauding membership fees.

How to deal with fraud:

1. Call the police in time. In case of WeChat fraud, the parties concerned should keep relevant chat records and other party's relevant information, and report the case to the local public security organ in time.

If you have the detailed information of the other party, you can go to the people's court to sue for rights protection. When you sue, you need to have some information about the defendant. Individuals need each other's name, ID number and home address, and units need enterprise name, location and organization code.

3. File a case and call the police. Some parties may be cheated for a relatively small amount. No matter whether it can meet the filing criteria, as long as it encounters fraud, it is necessary to call the police at the first time.

The sentencing standard for the amount of fraud is more than 3000 yuan. Specifically, those who defraud public or private property in an amount of more than 3,000 yuan but less than 10,000 yuan, more than 30,000 yuan but more than 100,000 yuan and more than 500,000 yuan are respectively deemed as "a large amount" and "a particularly large amount" as stipulated in Article 266 of the Criminal Law, and are convicted and punished. The higher people's courts and people's procuratorates of all provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government may, in combination with the economic and social development of the region, jointly study and determine the specific amount standards to be implemented in the region within the scope of the amount specified in the preceding paragraph, and report them to the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate for the record.

Legal basis:

Article 266 of the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC). Whoever defrauds public or private property in a relatively large amount shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or public surveillance, and shall also, or shall only, be fined; If the amount is huge or there are other serious circumstances, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years and shall also be fined; If the amount is especially huge or there are other especially serious circumstances, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years or life imprisonment, and shall also be fined or confiscated. Where there are other provisions in this Law, such provisions shall prevail.

In addition:

After the swindler is sentenced, the victim's money will still be paid back.

After assuming criminal responsibility, it should also bear civil liability for compensation. Criminal liability cannot replace civil liability. This is the case in general criminal incidental civil proceedings. Unless the plaintiff voluntarily withdraws, the debt still exists. Therefore, it is necessary to pay back the money after sentencing for fraud. But the criminal law does not require repayment. According to Article 266 of the Criminal Law, the crime of fraud refers to the act of defrauding a large amount of public or private property by fabricating facts or concealing the truth for the purpose of illegal possession. Whoever commits this crime is sentenced to public surveillance, criminal detention, fixed-term imprisonment, life imprisonment, death penalty and other principal punishments according to the amount of fraud, and is also fined or confiscated of personal property and other supplementary punishments, but the victim is not ordered to make restitution for economic losses.

Before the judgment, it is only used as the basis for discretionary lighter punishment, and after the judgment, it may be used as the basis for repentance, which will affect whether to reduce the sentence in combination with other circumstances.

Simply put, if the judgment has been made, there will be no adverse consequences if the repayment is not made. At most, the punishment will not be mitigated, and the punishment will never be aggravated on the basis of the judgment.

If there is no judgment yet, non-repayment will make the judge's sentencing biased, which may be one year or two years (of course, within the scope of sentencing permitted by law).