Technically, X86 is easier to achieve high performance, and ARM is easier to achieve low power consumption and high efficiency.

Because of the strength of Qualcomm and Intel, these two processors can compete in the same field.

800 adopts asynchronous quad-core design, while Z2580 is dual-core and hyper-threaded to four logic cores.

Judging from the running score, 800 is dominant. Although you can say how advanced the Z2580 is, it is a fact.

The CPU part can be said to be evenly matched, and even Intel is better. With the advantages of instruction set and years of design experience, Intel has completely achieved the degree of "taking more than one thing".

There is a big gap between GPUs. The Z2580 adopts PowerVR SGX 544MP2, which was completely defeated by Adreno 330 of 800. 330 is the strongest mobile phone GPU at present (some people say that Apple A7 is better than him, so the landlord will go and evaluate it himself). 330 is about 50% higher than 544MP2 on average, and the loss of Z2580 on GPU is terrible.

The real practical experience, z2580 died in optimization. From every evaluation, it can be seen that the compatibility (especially the game compatibility) of Z2580 is extremely disgusting, and there is still a problem of high calorific value. Anyway, this link 2580 was exploded in seconds.

After all, there are too few products using Intel in the market, which are not mature. Z2580 can only be regarded as a test product for Intel to enter mobile computing.

Z2580 is indeed an excellent product with exemplary technology, but the market tends to mature Qualcomm 800.

That's about it.

I hope my answer can help you!