Gynecological anesthesiologists broadcast the operation live without the consent of the mother. What's going on here? On the evening of 65438+ 10 18, a suspected male doctor broadcasted a gynecological operation in Miri, which attracted attention. 18 that night, a reporter contacted the customer service staff about this matter. The other party said that after internal inspection, during the live broadcast of 65438+1October 15, the live broadcast room was repeatedly warned and interrupted, and then it was permanently banned. At present, he has reported the case to the public security organ and said that he will actively cooperate with the police to carry out investigation and evidence collection. In addition, the police also issued a notice saying that a case has been filed and the doctor involved has been arrested.

There is negligence in management, but the responsibility of this hospital and doctors is greater. At present, Didi has also responded to this incident. In this regard, the user account has been permanently banned, even so, the victim's injury can not be recovered. Now the police have arrested the doctors involved in gynecological surgery, and the doctors have also borne the relevant legal punishment. This has caused serious psychological harm to the parties, and netizens strongly call for strengthening management measures to avoid similar incidents from happening again. After the live webcast of gynecological surgery involving doctors was exposed, it attracted many people's attention. Male doctors broadcast gynecologic surgery live for miles, exposing patients' private parts after anesthesia. And there was a male colleague there, but he didn't stop him. It can be seen that they are used to such similar behaviors. I wonder how many patients have encountered such behavior. Treatment? .

They violated the privacy rights of these patients. It is said that this man is not an obstetrician. In response to this situation, Li Li also said that they repeatedly warned and cut off the signal during the live broadcast, and then permanently banned this account. In my opinion, Li Li should bear part of the responsibility. Although Bi Li took the initiative to report and fully cooperated with the routine investigation and evidence collection, as a website, the content published by users should be checked, so there were omissions in the management of Bi Li.

(The picture comes from the Internet. If there is any infringement, please contact the author to delete it. )