I watched this movie with excitement and surprise. This movie full of many small surprises made me feel very warm. Every picture in the whole movie is like a delicate and perfect oil painting, and the actors' costumes and shapes are also very exquisite and gorgeous. Every detail in the film is perfect, accompanied by the music with local ethnic characteristics in Europe. It can be said that the whole movie is a metaphor besides paying tribute to the master. Simply classifying it as comedy, suspense, adventure and plot is superficial. In fact, it is more like a documentary, a historical film and a literary film. The documentary recorded the classic film techniques left by Liu Bieqian, Hitchcock (controversial), Rossini, Zhuo Berlin and others. Historical films record the spiritual connotation of the decline of European civilization, while literary films focus on the tone and style. All the actors' performances are also in place. However, if we really want to understand all the connotations of this film, we must have a certain understanding of European culture and history at that time. The Grand Budapest Hotel is actually talking about the decline of traditional European civilization. Specifically, it is about the history of Jewish exile. More precisely, it is an autobiography about Zweig leaving his declining spiritual home and dying of a broken heart. It can be simply understood that the evil forces in the film, the eldest son of the aristocratic family and the thugs fighting for the inheritance, are all metaphors of Nazi Germany's evil deeds that ravaged Europe at that time. Gustav wants to get the oil painting he deserves in the film, which is a metaphor for the Jews who are constantly being persecuted. The metaphor of this painting is to express that the whole Jewish nation is cautious, has spread from Jerusalem to the whole world, and gradually inherited the material and spiritual wealth of Europe, which they deserve. At this time, the son and family of the deceased stood up. A pragmatist who only cares about wealth and reorganizes his inheritance only finds that the painting has been lost. He was tyrannical, crazy and rude, ignoring laws and contracts, amending wills, murdering lawyers and chasing witnesses, but he had a perverted attachment to inheritance. Is this like Hitler? As the heir of the same culture, he wanted to possess all the heritage of his ancestors, but he didn't inherit its essence at all. At the same time, he tore up the armistice treaty, resorted to war and slaughtered Jews. ......
Zweig in the ideal world became Gustav who died for his ideal. Zero, the successor, stayed in the narrative of the novel, guarding the spiritual home of the Grand Hotel, and passed on this humanistic feeling to the writers in the literary world. The author is Zweig in the real world, who went to South America to recuperate and never returned to the motherland. Through the carrier of novels, writers continue to pass on their thoughts to the girls who are studying, that is, the green tea cousins of that era. Under the impetus of green tea cousins, the director read it.
The director's strength lies in that even with the lens language, he can bring us an immersive nostalgic pleasure. Today, many people can't do so well except show their career lines, high technology and cuteness.
The reason why we well-informed, intelligent and intelligent audiences can experience a kind of aesthetic feeling that can only be understood but not expressed is because the essence of culture is the same as human nature and can only be perceived with the soul.
The film Braveheart is about the Scottish national hero william wallace. The film has a grand scene, and the combination of love and resistance to violence presents the theme of American heroes.
From the viewing point of view, the film is well-made and the actors' performance is remarkable. Gibson perfectly explained Wallace's desire for freedom, especially when Wallace shouted "freedom" on the guillotine ...
But you will be disappointed if you look up the historical materials of Scotland at that time. Braveheart refers not to william wallace, but to Roibert Briuis, the Scottish king who betrayed william wallace many times in the film. The plot of betraying William Wallace is naturally fictional in the film. Roibert Briuis in history is a true Scottish national hero. In the era of King Edward I of England of England, Scotland faced the fate of assimilation and annexation. It was Roibert Briuis who led the Scots to have a small-scale conflict with England, and won a key victory in the Battle of Bannockburn, which finally drove the English out of Scotland.
He was brave in the war and often rode horses to fight the enemy. In the Battle of Bannockburn, he just rushed to the front and killed the enemy with an axe. There was a legend that after Roibert Briuis's death, a knight who followed him for many years wanted to take his heart to the holy land for burial. When he arrived in Spain, it happened that an alien invaded the local Catholics, so he bravely joined the battle. With Roibert Briuis's brave heart, take me with you to drive away the pagans. He rushed to the front line of the battle, and when the battle was about to win, he still fell with that heart. Later, many poets recited this legend, and the title of the poem was Brave Heart.
Comrades in Hollywood turned heroes into bears. Look at how they turned a shameless person into a saint.
Everyone remembers the beautiful and kind angelic French princess, the dream lover of countless people.
Isabel, a French princess in history, is the daughter of King Philip IV of France, nicknamed "The Mother Wolf of France". Do you know what it is from this name?
Edward II was gay (as in the movie), but as a king, he had to get married. 1308, Edward II married Princess Isabel of France.
Although he married a noble French princess, Edward II was really not interested in women. His interest is men, and naturally he ignores the French princess. Edward II really looked down on the new queen. French princesses are not easy to mess with.
Edward II and old Edward are just one heaven and one earth, totally different. They were defeated by Robert I in the outside world. They loved their comrades at home and enjoyed themselves.
1325, Isabel took the opportunity to go to France and fled back to France, becoming the mistress of Mortimer, an exiled British aristocrat. The two men colluded against Edward II.
1326 In September, the two men led French soldiers back to London. At this time, the relationship between King Edward II and the nobility had already collapsed. Isabel came back and was warmly welcomed by Londoners. Edward II abandoned his family and even his retainer left him.
Isabel executed Despenser and his son. 1327, Edward II was forced to abdicate under the coercion of Parliament, and he and Isabel's son Edward Junior became the king of England, which was prepared for Edward III (1327- 1377 reigned).
Isabel imprisoned Edward II in Berkeley Castle, leaving him hungry and cold in the dark castle. In September this year, under the command of the French female wolf, the killer came to Edward II and inserted a red-hot iron bar into Edward II's anus. Edward II's screams spread for miles, and the generation of the bad king was over.
Therefore, movies are movies and history is history. Never treat movies as history.
Oscar Film Review III. The Oscar-winning film "Unforgettable Tonight" is a thrilling and subversive film.
The film begins with the story of a rich man's daughter marrying a criminal (William), which aroused the audience's curiosity. The text explains that this woman didn't die because of her unscrupulous husband, which is even more striking and makes people locked in the plot from the beginning.
The main story begins with the revenge of the hired killer after the female was disfigured. Let's talk about the main characters and wonderful plots.
Judging from the accuracy of the gun, Bob in England is a good man.
Little Bill is a rather bossy and unreasonable detective, and he used a lot of space in the film to describe his vicious style. He repaired Bob very well in England, and the scene of hitting people was too real, which highlighted the violent tendency of little Bill. And the hero William Monie also suffered a lot from him.
Ned, it's not hard to see that he is a loyal friend.
William, the first hero. In the film: William was shocked when someone came to tell him that his friend Ned had been killed by Little Bill. She told William about the situation one by one, focusing on some things Ned said William had done before, which played the role of bedding and foil. It is not difficult to see that William will definitely come back to avenge Ned. From the moment William pointed the gun at Little Bill, until William killed several detectives, and then to some words William said at the end of the film, we can see that William is a cowboy with indomitable spirit and courage. In particular, William's shot at Bill Jr. showed the toughness of his style. Bill Jr. finally said frankly, "See you in hell, William Moni." The mighty little bill finally died at his hands. English Bob-Bill William Jr., these three are better than one, and the witness is the screenwriter. At first, he wrote for Bob, but later he was left behind by Little Bill. Finally, he was surprised at William's ability. It can be said that he is a witness to the strength (or degree of violence) of the three people.
The difference between this film and previous westerns is that there is no strong contrast between good and evil, and there is no scene where cowboys pose and fight with guns. Instead, it is the truth of the gun battle and the clarity of the plot. The most successful part of the film is that William is not portrayed as an omnipotent hero from beginning to end, which is so boring.
After watching this movie, I have to admire Eastwood's acting and attraction. This western movie master is really incisive!