Open Baidu APP to see more high-definition pictures.
The pros and cons have their own views, and both insist on the one who saves the painting. From beginning to end, the implementation of famous paintings not only has aesthetic value, but also has greater value. Cai Kangyong and Luo Zhenyu said that this painting represents some immortal cultural value; Zhan Qingyun said that this painting embodies the hard work of those who protect it; Huang Zhizhong said that this painting embodies the creator's painstaking efforts and echoes "Crying in the Distance"; On the other hand, the positive side retorts that if you can't even hear the crying nearby, how can you talk about the crying in the distance?
The debate was wonderful! But in fact, it ignores a very important point-the value of the two cannot be compared, and painting can be extended to art, culture and inheritance; Cats represent life. So to some extent, this argument is also untenable, which is called the incommensurability of value.
What is the incommensurability of value?
Example 1:
Imagine that you take out two pieces of bread and ask me which one I want. I'm not sure how to choose. At this time, you spread a layer of blueberry jam on a piece of bread, and I will not hesitate to choose the piece with jam.
Example 2:
Imagine that you take out a piece of bread and a pencil and ask me which one I want. I'm not sure how to choose. Then you spread blueberry sauce on a piece of bread. Sorry, I'm still not sure how to choose.
Look at the difference in the second example-in fact, it is useless for you to apply 10 layer of jam, because it is not the same grade as a pencil.
After all, painting and cats belong to different types of values, because everyone has different preferences and different perceptions of different values. It is understandable to choose a painting or a cat.
But if I really want to argue, I will argue from Zhan Qingyun's point of view:
Zhan Qingyun
Zhan Qingyun:
This topic asks you what to save, save the cat or save the painting. It is to save this action, but when we actually choose, we choose what I can give up. What did I give up when I chose to give up this cat? What I give up is a fresh life, what I give up is its wailing, and what I give up is a little guilt for its owner.
And when I chose to give up this painting, what did I give up? Am I giving up the drunken graffiti left by a dead author? Did I give up a little tissue paper and a little paint? When I stood in this fire, I looked around and felt that there was no one around. I am saving this painting alone, but I am standing in front of this picture. On the axis of time and history, I am not alone.
What's the point of such a responsibility? As we all know, in the1930s, during the Japanese invasion of China, more than 13000 boxes of the most precious cultural relics were transported from the Forbidden City in China. 14 years, these cultural relics traveled more than 20,000 miles and went south in three ways, hardly damaged. How did this great miracle happen? It is a generation of people in the Forbidden City who say that these cultural relics are more important than human life. Do you think it is worth it?
For a country that is facing war and can't even guarantee its own survival, is it worthwhile to protect those lifeless cultural relics, things whose authors are bound to be dead and unknown, those heavy stone drums, those bronzes, those faded silks and embroideries, and those Song paintings that I may not understand, tang style? Worth it. The more in the chaos, the more in the fire, the more in the disaster, the more we should remember the cultural symbols left by our ancestors at that time. They have United us in history, in a chaotic and difficult period of a country, and at this moment, in this fire, it falls on your's shoulders.
You said that a painting is just a cultural relic. Today, our era is no longer the era of 1930. Today, we have a very mature 3d scanning technology, which can record many paintings, precious information and the clearest details through electronic archiving. And I may just be an ordinary person. If it is not hung in this museum, I may not feel it or see where it grows. Yes, the value of art is often constructed. The value of art not only exists in those who create it through painting, but also belongs to those who admire and protect it from generation to generation. If I say today, it's just a painting. It knows me, but I don't know it. It's just a painting. Besides this painting, there are many other paintings in the world. The author is dead. It's just a painting. On the day when we pulled art down from the altar, all the meaning of construction disappeared, and all the meaning was dispelled by those who sought the lost treasure among the people, their efforts, and those overseas people who wanted to bring the national treasure home.
Just like I heard the story of the old palace, so I really want to see these cultural relics. This is the beginning of ordinary people's curiosity about art and their own national history. Before me, in the long history of this painting, many people pursued, protected and saved it. As long as any one of them has a little brains and chooses to save the cat, this painting is not here. I was one of the baton, and I took the responsibility that fell on me. At this time, standing between the flames of fire, my choice is only a moment, but on the long historical line that this painting extends out, there are countless places where you will go.
The art gallery caught fire, and there was a famous painting and a famous cat in it. I saved the cat, and my life cost more!