If compulsory exercise is justified for personal health or professional needs, then I think it should be accepted. For example, as an athlete, in order to maintain their competitive state, they may need to exercise with a certain intensity.
In addition, if you have health problems such as chronic diseases, doctors suggest taking exercise, so you should also accept it.
However, if compulsory exercise is for unreasonable reasons, such as compulsory requirement to reach a certain physical standard or simple abuse of power, then I think it should be opposed.
Because this kind of compulsory exercise may cause physical and psychological harm, and may also violate personal freedom and rights.
As for my personal fitness preference, I think it is most important to choose the way that suits me. Everyone's physical condition, preferences and goals are different, and the way that suits them will be different.
Some people like aerobic exercise such as running, swimming and yoga, while others prefer strength training such as lifting weights and punching sandbags.
For me, I prefer aerobic exercise, such as jogging, swimming and indoor cycling. These exercises can improve heart and lung function, burn calories, reduce stress, and also help to maintain a happy mood and sleep quality.
Of course, in addition to the traditional fitness methods, there are also many emerging fitness methods, such as Pilates, spinning, yoga and so on. These methods also have many fans.
However, I think that no matter which way you choose, the key is to persevere and adhere to regular exercise in order to achieve lasting results.
In short, fitness is an important living habit, which is conducive to maintaining health, enhancing physical fitness and improving psychological quality. The problem of accepting compulsory exercise needs to be analyzed in detail, and personal fitness preferences should be selected according to their own situation and goals.