At that time, there was a completely different view on the rural construction movement. Supporters believe that it has found a plan to reform rural areas, which represents the hope and direction of China's development. However, critics believe that the rural construction movement is "empty and useless" by engaging in secondary social transformation by moderate means, which cannot solve the fundamental problem. In the critical evaluation coordinates around the "Cultural Revolution", the rural construction movement was even criticized as an accomplice of imperialism and feudalism. After the academic research returned to normal, the two aspects of evaluation still exist, and the main points do not seem to be more profound than those of that year. Therefore, no matter from the perspective of realistic concern or academic truth-seeking, this social movement, which involves a wide range of fields and is highly practical, embodies the kink between tradition and modernity, eastern civilization and western civilization, and official and folk, will continue to attract people's attention, and its value and significance will continue to be debated.