When many people realize their knowledge, they will struggle with a question: Is the online micro-course good for audio or video?

This question is like:

1. Eggs or atomic bombs? The final conclusion is that people who make atomic bombs are not as good as those who sell tea eggs.

2. Is the bike better or the car better? The final conclusion is that the value of mobike boss Hu Weiwei has increased by 654.38+0 billion in two years, faster than any boss in the automobile industry.

If you want to compete hard, the atomic bomb is definitely better than the egg. A car has four wheels, while a bicycle has only two wheels. The former is superior to the latter in cost and performance, but they all have their own adaptation scenarios: for example, you have to use a car for long-distance running, wind and sun, snow and ice weather, receiving guests and so on. And you can only use your bike when you are exercising at close range, in traffic jams, or walking on small roads.

Back to the topic, some people may think that video has pictures, sounds, words and moving images, and the audio is single, so video is more colorful and better than audio.

I am still the same sentence: each has its own application scenarios. When you are driving, crowded, cooking, running, lying in bed with your eyes closed, you want to attend classes. At this time, I am afraid it can only be audio. I always get distracted when I watch videos.

Maybe you will say: I just listen to the videos of those scenes.

Then I can only reply to you: you really don't understand the essential difference between video and audio.

Excuse me, have you ever heard of "watching movies"? When did you hear about "listening to movies"?

If it makes no difference whether a video is watched or not, is it still called a video? At most, it is a video version of the audio.

You should be talking about "sitting on the stage without any expression, and there is no other interaction and interruption at the end". This kind of listening does not affect learning, but what advantages does it have over audio? I think it's not as good as audio. Because people have higher expectations for videos, and then when they watch your videos, their interest will drop immediately. If it is audio, he knows that he can only taste it slowly in his mind, but it will not affect his thinking because of his eyes. Sometimes people just see too much from the outside, so they should do more introspection.

In short, video is not necessarily better than audio, mainly depends on the scene. Specifically, each has a broad space for use.