Current location - Health Preservation Learning Network - Healthy weight loss - How about refa's beauty instrument? Is it worth buying?
How about refa's beauty instrument? Is it worth buying?
In order not to let others think that I haven't used any nonsense, I want to take a photo of some beauty instruments I have used. I watermarked them. Please do not reprint.

Refa is one of my earliest beauty instruments. My evaluation of it is: low cost performance, average effect, not worth starting with.

Many people say that Refa is easy to use, but I really want to say that you may not have used the same type of equipment that is better to use.

Specifically, the reasons why I don't recommend Refa are:

The first and most important point is that its effect is really average.

Refa focuses on the micro-current boosting function. The so-called face-lifting is also because the lifting is tight and the excess meat is pulled up. A girl with a lot of fat and a fleshy face instead of edema is unlikely to expect her face to be thin.

However, the Refa current is very weak, and the effect must be adhered to for a long time, which is far less than Nuface, which is also based on micro-current pulling.

After using Nuface, you can obviously feel the face tightening and pulling up. I just started with Nuface and made a special comparison. Compared with the half face that has not been made, the position of eyebrow peak and jaw line will be lifted upward.

Milla Ducker, I used Nuface for promotion and maintenance before the wedding.

Second, Refa is easy to be misused.

Refa doesn't need a medium when it is used. Basically, micro-current can't be felt by human body, so many girls will push it if they have nothing to do. If it is used improperly for a long time, it is quite embarrassing. A friend of mine who is a stylist said that she has 2-3 sisters around her and often uses Refa, but she doesn't use it well, which pushes risorius down.

Finally, although it is an entry-level model, its cost performance is not high.

Only painless lifting function, but what about the price? 1800+。 The Nuface cost of single lifting function is two-thirds of it. The multifunctional Hitachi is also more suitable as an entry-level model than Refa. If you want to fight aging and lift pores, Tripollar, which focuses on RF function, is cheaper than Refa? 1000, I really can't figure out where to start Refa.

= Hitachi N4000

Speaking of examples, I'd like to recommend Nuface again. It's really not an advertisement. I started with three kinds of micro-current lifting beauty instruments, which have the best comprehensive performance.

So I think Refa, the star effect is greater than the use effect, and it is said that it is an entry-level beauty instrument, but it is really not that valuable. My own Refa has been idle for six months.

If you are looking for face-lifting and firmness, I recommend using Nuface with obvious effect. After all, you don't need to charge what you use anytime and anywhere, it's just an added benefit. Beauty instrument is the most important effect! ! ! If you can ensure that your face is not wrinkled, don't say that you want to charge. If you let me lie down for half an hour every day, I will be very happy.