65438+1October 16 in the early morning, the travel blogger "Fang kiki" with100000 fans questioned another travel blogger 19 to 2 1 on Weibo that he had been copying his own topics and copywriting.
Screenshot from Qifang kiki Weibo
No matter the words in Weibo or the photos below, the names of plagiarized bloggers are coded, and the screenshots of the photos also avoid the frontal photos of portraits.
Only two hours after Weibo sent it out, the real culprit of plagiarism "Jessica Hester Hsuan Yayan" appeared. Her Tik Tok account "Li Xiaoxuan" has nearly 5 million fans, and Weibo has nearly 65,438+10,000 fans. Although not as big as funky kiki, it is also big.
The cause of the matter is this:
6543810.4, "Fang Qiqi" released a video on Tik Tok and other platforms, "I read the notes of grave robbery for the second time and decided to go to Changbai Mountain to find Zhang Qiling. Vivo # stable 202 1 "
Image source: Tik Tok @ 个个个个个个
As new media people, you should see some strange things.
Fang Qi Qiqi has just finished reading the notes of grave robbery and went to Changbai Mountain to look for Zhang Qiling.
Only four days later, Li Xiaoxuan went to Changbai Mountain to look for Zhang Qiling, and made notes on grave robbery. Moreover, the title contains "202 1 year", which is difficult to pass without saying it. ......
Then at eight o'clock in the morning, Qi Fangqi made another comment in the comments. If she does anything again, I will tear it open.
Sure enough, Li Xiaoxuan, as an original travel self-media blogger, how can she allow herself to be labeled as plagiarism? Li Yiping, her husband, commented on Weibo that Fang Qi copied Li Xiaoxuan.
Video posted by Fang Qi Kiki (this comment has been deleted)
Video released by Kiki in Fang Qi (Weibo deleted)
Li Xiaoxuan also posted a comparison in Weibo, and then deleted it. Her husband also asked: Do you know Chinese? Do you know what plagiarism is?
Fang Qi may be shocked by this attitude, and directly post @ Li Xiaoxuan, with a long content.
One * * * has four points, which I summarized a little.
First refute the question Changbai Mountain video.
Secondly, the outline of Doraemon's husband's topic was written in 65438+ 10/0, and the script was handed over to Party A in the early morning of 24th. At this time, Li Xiaoxuan's video has not yet come out. The relationship between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law, girlfriends getting married and buying air tickets to see girlfriends are essentially different from the topics of the Forbidden City, Changbai Mountain and Linzhi.
Third, the topic of meeting fans was shared by Lucifer, and Lucifer knew it before he did it.
Finally, some fans said that you had imitated it before, but I didn't see it. But now you are not a small blogger who just made a video, and the frequency and similarity have already exceeded the boundaries.
For those precise lens angles, there are also copywriters who want to give answers. Sincerely apologize and accept, but you pretend to be poor and sympathetic. If I am confident that I have not plagiarized, then I can go through legal procedures.
As a video blogger, Qi Fang kiki released a video on the evening of 65438+1October 24th, and continued to question Li Xiaoxuan's plagiarism.
Li Xiaoxuan also replied again at 65438 on June 27th that she didn't plagiarize, saying that her video script plagiarized earlier than Qi Fang Qiqi.
You come and go on both sides, which is really dazzling. ......
Regarding who Fang Qiqi is, I once wrote an article to analyze her video operation mode. "The annual tourism income is 65.438+million. What are the operation routines of tourism from the media?" 》
1. Video comparison
I have mentioned in many articles before that manuscript washing is actually plagiarism, but I can only say that it is not as blatant as plagiarism. Plagiarism refers to copying a paragraph from others directly, or copying the whole original content and publishing it as your own work.
Let's take a look at the content of two video bloggers. Is there really plagiarism?
In "Parents' Theme", Fang Qi's video titled "Traveling with Parents" was released on 20 19 12 2 1. Li Xiaoxuan's video title "Paying Parents Back" was released on June 2020 1 1.
In "Tibet Theme", Fang Qi's video title "Peach Blossom in Milin" was released on March 29th, 20 19. Li Xiaoxuan's video titled "Go to Tibet with the person you love! Release time: 2019110/October 2 1.
The theme and copy are really similar, and after watching their videos, I always feel that the video shooting style is too similar.
Li Xiaoxuan retorted that Changbai Mountain was released four days earlier than Fang Qi, and Doraemon Husband was released earlier than Fang Qi who copied herself. The Sweet Road to Love, which was released earlier than Fang Qi and Better Days, is not overbearing and forbids others to shoot the same subject as themselves.
Let's take a look at the video of Changbai Mountain.
In "Changbai Mountain Theme", Fang Qi's video title "Notes on Tomb Robbery" was released on 202 1 1 4. Li Xiaoxuan's video title "Ten Years' Covenant of Changbai Mountain" was released on 65438+February 3 1 (top), 202 1, 65438+1October 8, 2020 (bottom).
The last episode released by 65438+February 3 1 mainly focuses on Changbai Mountain hot springs and hot pots. 65438+1The next episode released on October 8th is climbing Changbai Mountain. In the video of Fangqi 65438+1October 4th, it is to climb Changbai Mountain directly. Fang Qi himself explained the problem.
There is really no overlap, but the sentence pattern of Li Xiaoxuan's next episode is a bit like that of Fang Qi.
Li Xiaoxuan's opening sentence "I want to climb Changbai Mountain to find bronze doors frozen at the bottom of Tianchi Lake", except that bronze doors is at the bottom of Tianchi Lake, "Will bronze doors hide at the bottom of this frozen Tianchi Lake?" 」
2. Video style
Fang Qi, a graduate of Nanjing Media College, was the location host of the Discovery Tour Channel "Beautiful China Tour", and now she is a short travel video blogger. Tik Tok has 654.38+007 million fans, Weibo has 654.38+05 13500 fans, and Billy has 85,000 fans.
The video is distinctive in personal style and literary. The dubbing is just right, and the picture is equally excellent. The video of travel bloggers naturally focuses on various tourist destinations.
I prefer to describe it poetically. These all need a lot of materials and literary literacy as the backing, and now we can maintain our own style from beginning to end and turn ourselves into a style representative when a style is at its extreme.
Therefore, Fang Qi successfully complements her videos with literature and art. When she mentions a tourist blogger with literary style, people will think of Qi Fang, which is the reason for her consistent style.
People who don't like Fang Qi always think her videos are too melodramatic. It's natural that some people like it and some people hate it. Just like Li, who is on fire abroad, some people think that her life in the countryside is fake, but these are the memory labels of their videos.
There are too many bloggers who travel from the media. Without memory, they can't walk out of the circle. Li Xiaoxuan, compared with self-media travel bloggers, I think life bloggers are more suitable for her.
From showing love to showing affection, there is harmony between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law. It takes up much more space than tourism.
After watching two videos, I can't tell where they are, but they are a little similar. Comparing the above lens with the copy, I personally feel that the voice is more like it.
The output value in the video is also a bit strange. I often see the booking in the video, and I don't know what I am entangled in.
Personally, her video audience is more girls who love dreaming and younger. I long for sweet love and carefree life. As mentioned before, Mi Meng's short video of re-starting a business is in this direction.
summary
They are all self-media bloggers who travel, and they are also women. It is normal to incorporate delicate emotions into the creation of short videos.
It is normal to bump into the same shooting scene, but it is a bit abnormal many times, the similarity of copywriting is not normal, and the shooting of the lens is not normal.
In fact, it is easy to correct plagiarism, because long paragraphs can completely prove that it is much more difficult to wash the manuscript and it is difficult to identify it literally.
More importantly, it is more difficult to prove that you have not edited the manuscript. I was scolded and plagiarized by my colleagues a few days ago, but it has nothing to do with each other.
Whoever plagiarizes and washes the manuscript, who creates a certain style first, and later makes the same type of style, will indeed be suspected of learning from it. Therefore, it is important to go in early and seize the opportunity.
For example, I started writing operational knowledge as early as four or five years ago, and I have a specific creative style. I entered the business earlier. Suddenly, a colleague said that I washed the manuscript and imitated it, which was not very tenable. There is no motive at all.
To avoid being questioned about copying and washing manuscripts, one is not to do these stupid things, and the other is to improve the quality of content beyond peers.
In the face of suspected plagiarism, both sides should give reasonable evidence. If you really can't get an ugly story, then go to court, and Jing M. Guo will be sentenced to plagiarism.
What do you think of this matter?
Support it in the lower right corner of the article