First of all: interpret the debate, because it is a positive debate. At the beginning of the debate, it is necessary to clarify the argument that the better the intelligence, the better the physical strength, not useless, not useless (disagree with onlyyou2003 upstairs). At the same time, the keyword is "today's society", which is the keyword. It is not that primitive society can eat and wear warm clothes by hunting and physical strength.

Grasping the key words and agreeing that physical strength is good is half the battle.

Second, what will the other party say: 1, physical strength is nothing-physical strength is 1, intelligence, morality and so on are all zeros behind 1, physical strength is gone, everything is zero, so physical strength is really good.

2, good intelligence is also for good physical strength-making money is for fitness, beauty and health, and good intelligence is for good physical strength, so good physical strength is really good.

3, much ado about nothing, much worry-a simple life, a healthy life is the expectation of people in today's society.

If I were the landlord, I would consider these two aspects first, and then I would start to enrich and strengthen my argument and try to deal with the other side's argument. Specifically, I should consider not talking for at least one night. You can ask your own supplementary questions, and I'll strengthen your argument and attack the other side's argument. Hehe, my college debate contest is very good. Haha