The manuscript of "Summary of Four Treasures of Continuation" has been photocopied for a long time, and the punctuated version has been published in classics and collections, and the rest is slowly sorted out. This book has many problems. To tell the truth, quite a few abstracts are of little value for sorting out and reading. Others are not only worthless, but also seriously wrong. If you believe these summaries, you will continue to make mistakes. Therefore, it seems that we can't simply summarize the summary of the continuation of the four treasures with such general words as "most of them are of poor quality" and "the author only copied the preface with reference to the academic history of nearly 300 years and kept the abstract". Speak out if you have any problems. Because of the need of work, I read through all the abstracts (punctuation marks) of the book "Classics and Classics" and read the etiquette class repeatedly. But because I'm not interested in these books, I won't talk about them. Most of the abstracts (drafts) of the Ministry's sage, Buddhism and doctors have also been read. Here I want to present a book as a representative to talk about the Physician's Digest. Zhou Shouzhong, a physician in the Southern Song Dynasty, wrote three books, namely Qiu Meng, a famous doctor in past dynasties, Yue Lan of Health Preservation, and Compilation of Health Preservation, which have been widely spread all over the world. The book Qiu Meng is rarely circulated. Only Ji once hid a book in the Southern Song Dynasty, then entered the Forbidden City, and now it is in the National Palace Museum in Taipei. Photocopying was done in the Republic of China and after liberation, so it is not difficult to see. "Reading Orchid" and "Lei Zuan" were printed and reprinted many times in the Ming Dynasty, which had a great influence. Therefore, both the Summary of Si Ku and the Summary of the Continuation of Si Ku have listed the entries for these two books. Overview, classification and miscellaneous categories of Sikuquanshu: Volume 22 of Miscellaneous Health Care and Volume 2 of Reading were all edited by Zhou Shouzhong in Song Dynasty. Shouzhong nunnery Ge (upper capacity and lower wood) is an ancient prose character in China. I don't know who it is. At the beginning, the things to be avoided in health care were recorded on a monthly basis, which was called "moon view". Later, it was widely published as a miscellaneous compilation in Renwu, Jiading. The first part is a general narrative of three parts, and the second part is divided into thirteen parts by category. Later generations attached "Reading Orchid" to it, which is a book with the general title of "Sage Health Care", not its real name. The Summary of Si Ku is classified as miscellaneous books with Lei Bian and Yue Lan, but it describes Zhou Shouzhong and life is unknown without any comments on the contents of the book, which shows that library officials do not attach much importance to this book. However, this abstract is generally correct. The manuscript is also an earlier Ming edition (the time and source of several Ming editions of Lei Bian are more complicated, so I won't go into details here), and there are 22 volumes of Lei Bian and 2 volumes of Yue Lan, which are very valuable. The only thing that can be discussed is that the title of "Lei Bian" was mistakenly called "Miscellaneous Compilation" because the Ming version was called "Miscellaneous Compilation". It doesn't matter. Let's take a look at the Summary of Four Treasures of the Study's Continued Books first. Here comes the question. Now according to the manuscript, the text is as follows. Manuscripts of Four Treasures of Continuation, Subdivision and Physician's Summary: two volumes of Health Preservation, two volumes of Health Preservation Collection and one volume of Health Preservation Collection, written by Yang Shouzhong in Ming Dynasty, with the word "Rong 'an" left, and the source is unknown. During the Wanli period, the publication of Qiantang Hu Huan Wen was included in Gezhi Series. Its preface "Collection of Health Courses" says: "Yang Jun compiled" Health Month ",which is just a book. I think it is of great benefit to others, so I will use it together. " Shouzhong and Hu are both at the same time, but the total title of the series is Ming People, while the latest dictionary of names is called Song People, and its masterpiece Shouzhong is unknown. This copy is from a series of books, which is more reliable. To the "photo album", there is no need to write a name. However, the title corrected by Hu added the word "new engraving" to the title, which seems to record the works of predecessors. Sun Simiao's Qian Jin Fang is the most detailed one for those who use medical records to preserve their health. There are generally more than one hundred books, nine times out of ten of which are Taoist quotations. All the books cited in the book are miscellaneous books on Taoism and medicine, and some medical books are quite lost or rare, so they should all be based on Taoist books. Its gold objects should be avoided, and the classification is slightly based on materia medica. The ancients did not have a special book on people who took care of their lives in the four seasons, and it was quite fair to increase with the increase of things. The attached "photo album" is very concise. There are three ways to maintain: one is to nourish the mind, the other is to cherish the gas, and the third is to suffer from illness. He also said: six desires and seven emotions are omnipotent, so internal things are not born, so external troubles are not allowed. The use of materia medica is the ears of real dogs. "Its principle and the cover of the book are mutually useful, which is the essence of Taoism and doctors. It is more in line with the fact that the Summary of the Four Treasures of Xuwen, Lei Bian and Yue Lan belong to the category of physicians. The content of this abstract is ridiculous, and it needs to be dialectical sentence by sentence. The first is the version problem. According to the number of volumes and abstract contents, this banknote copy is a Gezhi series engraved by Ming Hu Huan Wen. Because some versions of Gezhi series of medical books were later put forward separately and carved into Shouyang series, Gezhi was originally Shouyang. Gezhi Edition or Shouyang Edition confused the number of original books, merged 22 volumes into two volumes, and at the same time followed the mistake of another Ming edition (not a four-stock edition) and named "Zhou Shouzhong" Zhou Shouzhong. In the process of engraving, Hu revised and abridged the original book Lei Zuan, which has many similarities and differences with various Ming editions, and quite a few of them were wrong. In a word, Shouyang edition or Gezhi edition is the edition with the worst quality, the most mistakes and the farthest distance from Zhou Shouzhong's original work, and it must not be adopted because it is widely circulated, let alone a fake edition with lower quality. The author of this abstract obviously knows nothing about these. Secondly, Life Photography is a kind of book in Shouyang series, followed by Lei Bian and Yue Lan. This is edited by Hu He, not written. The author attached Gillan to the abstract only because he attached Gillan to the banknote on which he was based. According to this convention, if the author has read the printed edition of Shouyang Series, I am afraid that most of the books will be added to each other by him. This is also unreasonable. Look at the summary again. 1. "Written by Yang Shouzhong in Ming Dynasty, with Chinese characters Rong 'an, whose native place is unknown. "The manuscript of Shouyang, on which the author is based, is of extremely low quality, and even the author's name is copied wrong, so there are incredible mistakes such as" Zhou Shouzhong "being" Yang Shouzhong "and" Rong 'an ". The original book Shouyang is correct. 2. The book Wanli Qiantang Hu Kan Ben was compiled into Gezhi Series. Its preface, Collection of Health Courses, says:' Yang Jun compiled Health Month, but it is a book. I think it is of great benefit to others, so I will use it together. "Shouzhong and Hu's are contemporary. The total title of the series is' Ming people', and the recent dictionary of names is called Song people. Its masterpiece' Shouzhong' is unknown. This copy is from a series of books, which is more reliable. " Zhou Shouzhong is a poet. Even though I don't know it was a Song Dynasty, according to Hu's sequence, I can't see the author's meaning of "keeping China and Hu at the same time". What's more strange is that the author of the abstract doesn't know where to see the General Catalogue of Gezhi Series, which indicates that Yang Shouzhong belongs to the Ming Dynasty. People can't help asking, since the author has seen the engraved edition of Gezhi series, why does he still use a copy as the base edition? At the same time, in the printed editions of Gezhi Series and Shouyang Series, Zhou Shouzhong was not mistaken for Yang Shouzhong. If the author saw the printed version, why didn't he correct such an obvious mistake? This is so weird. I'm afraid this can only make people feel that this universal label of "Ming people" is not invented by the abstract writer himself. And the things behind the Dictionary of Names as the basis for refutation are even more despicable and not worth mentioning. There is no bottom line for a book like Dictionary of Names to appear in the abstract. The dictionary is written correctly and the abstract is refuted wrongly. 3. "There is no need to write a name for" Photo Album ". However, adding the word "new engraving" to the title of Hu Jianbu seems to record the works of predecessors. " There is no big mistake in this passage in Life Photography, which is in line with the version characteristics of Shouyang. 4. "There are more than 100 books on it, and nine times out of ten are Taoist." This passage is valuable in the abstract, but it is also wrong. Which book is it? This is said immediately after "Photo Album", but "Photo Album" is only a few pages, which is an introduction to health preservation, without any items, far from "more than a hundred articles". If we are talking about Lei Bian, Lei Bian has more than 100 entries. But from the content behind, it is still "class compilation". The author points out that nine out of ten books by Lei are the general introduction of Taoism. Zhou Shouzhong's life is not easy to test, but it is obvious that he is closely related to Taoism. In the Postscript of Qiu Meng, a famous doctor in the past dynasties, Zhou Shouzhong claimed that the book was written in imitation of the genre of bamboo weaving in Yuan Xian, and quoted a large number of Taoist scriptures in Lei Bian. Even if Zhou Shouzhong is not a Taoist, he at least has Taoist beliefs and is familiar with Taoist scriptures. This point is not mentioned in the summary of Sikuquanshu, so it is meaningful to point it out. 5. "All the books cited in the book are miscellaneous books of Taoism and medicine, and some medical books have been lost or rare, so they should all be based on Taoist books." It is also true that there are a lot of lost articles in Lei's ancient books, such as Fenmen Suolu mentioned a few days ago, many of which are not found in other books. 5. "Its gold objects should be avoided, and the classification is slightly based on materia medica." Fortunately, the classification of thunder drills is a bit like cursive. 6. The attached "photo album" is accurate and precise. It is said that there are three kinds of maintenance methods:' one is to nourish the mind, the other is to cherish qi, and the third is to treat diseases.' He also said,' six desires and seven emotions cannot be done, internal affairs cannot be done, and foreign aggression cannot be entered. The use of materia medica is the ears of real dogs. ""Its theory and the cover of the book are mutually useful, which is the essence of Taoism and doctors. "The book" Deadly Collection "was not written by Zhou Shouzhong, nor was it a combination of Lei Bian and Yue Lan. It is only because the author of the abstract combined these three books according to the notes that these statements were made. If the facts are wrong, others will naturally become aimless and worthless. According to the author's classification table in front of the book "Continued Manuscripts of Siku Abstract", this abstract was written by Xia. Xia was a scholar in the late Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China. He helped save many books, and seems to be a poet. From the above analysis, Xia's abstract was scribbled, and he didn't even read the Summary of Siku, so he beat around the bush on the author's name, time and other issues and made mistakes. As for the version and content of medical books, it seems that little is known and there is no research. He has written many abstracts of doctors who continue to study the abstracts of the four major databases, and its quality can be imagined.