Scientific health care. Professor Lin Qingshun's "medical conscience" cancer expert shocked? A lady asked to be a friend of Facebook, and I took a look at her Facebook. As a result, the first post I saw was "scientific health preservation" (that is, my website), and she added a sentence "Take care of yourself and have knowledge" on it. I am very grateful to her for doing so much publicity for my website, and I hope other Facebook friends can do the same. I continue to despise her Facebook. Ah! What I saw immediately was "Japan's 40-year-old cancer expert was shocked: untie the myth of 10, don't be fooled by cancer!" .05 (reprinted on 2017/516) After I clicked on the reprint, I went to the website of the investment blog and saw this shocking article. The article does not indicate the date of publication, but it does indicate that the author is "sharing the article online", that is, "shameful". At the bottom of the title of the article is a photo of a gray-haired man, with the words "Kondo Makoto, a cancer expert affectionately called' the conscience of the medical profession' by the Japanese people" written in red. The following is an introduction to this "medical conscience", saying that he is a radiologist at Keio University Hospital in Japan and has been practicing medicine for more than 40 years. Note: He has been a lecturer for 3 1 year (1983-20 14), and he can't even be promoted as an assistant professor. Of course, the focus of the article is "solving 10 myths" mentioned in the title. They are: it is not cancer that is terrible, but "cancer treatment". It's no use finding true cancer earlier. The operation was a man-made serious injury. Chemotherapy is very toxic. 90% of cancers, whether cured or not, have the same survival time. Even if the doctor confirms that you have cancer, it's better to wait and see if you don't feel pain. Operation successful ≠ Cancer cured. The more "advanced" treatment, the more careful you should be. The inspection method is to emit X-rays in all directions at 360 degrees, and shoot the cross section of the human body. Enhancing immunity is not conducive to the prevention and treatment of cancer, or even completely ineffective. I have published 45 articles related to cancer on my website. In more than ten of them, I have repeatedly told readers that many cancer patients will choose "natural therapy" because most people are afraid of surgery, chemotherapy and electrotherapy. Known as "the conscience of the medical profession", Kondo Makoto catered to people's fear of surgery, chemotherapy and electrotherapy, and published a book "Cancer Does Not Need Treatment" again and again, earning both fame and fortune. I want to ask readers to make a simple logical thinking: If cancer really doesn't need treatment as Kondo Makoto said, then why is he a cancer expert? How can there be experts for diseases that don't need treatment? If this logic can't convince you to talk about Kondo Makoto, please read two articles. One reads "Don't blame luck" and "The truth of Kondo Makoto's cancer theory, the conscience of Japanese medical circles". Another article was written by Dr. Zhao Dazhong (Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taipei Rongzong), "Advice for Readers who have read Kondo Makoto's" 20 Advice Don't Be Killed by Cancer Doctors ". These two articles are well written and highly credible. In particular, the passage written by "Don't blame luck" is really classic: for a long time, the mainstream Japanese medical community has adopted a ignoring attitude towards Kondo. There is a word in Japanese called silent killing. As the name implies, Japanese academic circles have inherited Mr. Lu Xun's attitude that "the highest contempt is silence, and even eyes don't turn away". "Seeing this passage reminds me of the highest realm of samurai generals dressed in ancient costumes, unpredictable and intrigued in Japanese movies. Unfortunately, however, in this modern society dominated by the media, "silent killing" is useless. Silent killing is regarded as the default, and the default interpretation is acquiescence. Then, please read the next few paragraphs of the article "Don't blame luck" to understand how Kondo Makoto became a "medical conscience". However, it is obvious that this strategy can be used against ordinary people, but it is not feasible to ignore such a major problem that affects the lives and deaths of millions of people. I believe Kondo said that people choose not to receive treatment, and the cancer that could have been cured was delayed and lost their lives. The healthy people who originally planned to have regular physical examination for cancer screening also gave up the examination, which led to the delay in the appearance of tumors that could have been found early. The medical profession cannot sit still. Dr. Shirakawa Hirasaburo, honorary chairman of the National Cancer Center of Japan and chairman of the Association for Early Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer, published a long article in the medical journal Gastroenterology to refute Kondo's fallacy. Dr Ishikawa's article refuted Kondo's book one by one. He pointed out that Kondo received widespread attention at first because his book was published at a time when Japanese star Quan Zhenghong's gastric cancer surgery received media attention, so he was afraid of the pain caused by cancer surgery. At the same time, due to the toxic and side effects of chemotherapy drugs, the painful experience of cancer patients has been widely reported by the media. Kondo stood up and put forward a subversive theory of cancer treatment as a professional doctor, which naturally catered to the psychology of the people, so it became an instant hit. With this reputation, Kondo began to criticize cancer screening and physical examination, and began to whimsically put forward the "theory of cancer truth and falsehood." In his view, this statement can only be called an argument, but it can't be called a theory in any case. The fallacy, which should not be worth seeing, has been widely spread by the people and caused a very bad influence. Note: The treatment and cure of cancer depends on many factors, such as age, cancer type, early or late stage, pain index, etc. Please refer to my earlier publication "Prostate Cancer, Cured or Not". About the original source Author: Scientific Medical, moderator Lin Qingshun, a professor at the University of California, San Francisco (now retired), has 40 years of medical research experience, published nearly 200 research papers, and served as a member of the jury of more than 60 world-renowned medical journals. From the perspective of medical research, articles based on scientific evidence are published to solve the health myth wandering on the internet, help readers avoid being misled by unconfirmed information, and thus safeguard personal health.