Current location - Health Preservation Learning Network - Health preserving recipes - Compared with Chinese dietotherapy, which is more scientific? More practical?
Compared with Chinese dietotherapy, which is more scientific? More practical?
This is a matter of opinion.

There is no specific data to compare the two.

Nutrition is based on the material content of food, while Chinese medicine diet is based on the needs of the human body. They are complementary.

Personally, I think that nutrition can refer to the analysis and comparison of the main components, and the dietotherapy brand of traditional Chinese medicine refers to the effect on the human body.

Completely believe in nutrition, as you said, it can't be different from person to person. As we all know, poison can also be used to cure diseases and save lives.

It is also unscientific to completely believe in Chinese medicine diet therapy, because Chinese medicine is generally a knowledge of summing up experience, and there will always be deviations and omissions. In addition, because of the development of western medicine, many good things of Chinese medicine have not been well inherited and developed.

Also, don't trust TV or some propaganda means completely, because there is very little real thing in it, just business strategy. You probably know the famous "mung bean", hehe, very representative.

Nutrition can make people understand food materials more intuitively and simply, which is more "scientific" than traditional Chinese medicine from this perspective. China can be more suitable for individuals and more useful than nutrition from the perspective of human needs.

What else is science? My understanding of science is nothing more than understanding things according to our human way of thinking, especially many unconfirmed science right or wrong who knows. (This is just a personal opinion)