Current location - Health Preservation Learning Network - Health preserving recipes - Maserati's case against BMW was finally pronounced. Why did the female driver get a light sentence?
Maserati's case against BMW was finally pronounced. Why did the female driver get a light sentence?
The court held that the Maserati female driver showed repentance, so the sentence would be light. The court found that the defendant was eating at a kebab shop in Dongcheng District, yongcheng city. The perpetrator and his friends left in a Maserati SUV and drove along Tobin Road and Wenhua Road in Dongcheng District, yongcheng city. As they approached Garden Road, they hit six cars on the side of the road, and there was another car opposite, and there was another car on the side of the road.

The owner of the car who was forced to stop because he could not pass and the people around him came forward to persuade him, and the friend sitting in the back asked the perpetrator to leave. The perpetrators fled in the direction of the east outer ring along Huayuan Road and Jiji Road. When going to the intersection of East Outer Ring Road and Yongxing Street, I rear-ended with a BMW and waited for the high-speed traffic signal, which led to an accident and a fire on the BMW, resulting in two deaths 1 person seriously injured, and the total loss of other vehicles was1000,000 yuan.

The perpetrators know that drunk driving is illegal and will endanger public safety, but they ignore traffic laws and public safety. After the drunk driving traffic accident, they did not listen to dissuasion, continued to drive at high speed in the city and escaped, causing two deaths. The serious consequences of the first injury and property loss are subjectively allowed to continue the injury and deliberately endanger public safety. After drinking together, the defendants did not discourage the perpetrators from driving under the influence of alcohol. After the accident, his friend urged the perpetrator to drive away, which caused serious consequences. The actions of the three defendants have constituted the crime of endangering public safety by dangerous means.

The perpetrator is the direct and main perpetrator of the crime. The crime is serious and the consequences are serious. He should be punished by law. His friend plays a secondary role in the accomplice crime and is an accessory, which can reduce the punishment. Because the defendant was in a state of drunkenness at the time of committing the crime, he subjectively did not want or actively pursued the occurrence of harmful results, which was an indirect intentional crime and subjectively malignant and dangerous to the person. Different from intentional and intentional crimes that intentionally hit people by car and intentionally endanger public safety, the perpetrator can truthfully plead guilty after committing a crime and actively compensate the victim for economic losses. If he shows repentance, he can be given a lighter punishment according to law.