The theory of Huang Lao is a general term of Huangdi School and Laozi School, which began to form in the Warring States Period and became popular in the Western Han Dynasty. In fact, this school is a combination of Taoism and Legalism under the guise of emperor's thought and Laozi's thought, which was formed by combining other viewpoints such as Yin and Yang Nuwa Mohism.

Politically, this school advocates inaction and morality, while in the relationship between monarch and minister, Huang Lao school advocates that monarch and minister should be dominant, but monarch and minister should be friends.

In terms of self-cultivation, Huang Lao's theory advocates life-saving and positive selflessness. Don't be too greedy for fame and fortune in this world, or even abandon them.

Laozi and Zhuangzi, also known as metaphysics, is a new school derived from Taoism, which came into being in Wei and Jin Dynasties. The main representatives are Lao Zi and Zhuangzi. This school mainly advocates advocating nature and opposing struggle. Laozi and Zhuangzi's thoughts have dialectical factors and atheistic tendencies.

Now, who is more universal, the study of Huang Lao or the study of Zhuangzi? In fact, both the study of Huang Lao and the study of Zhuangzi have strong universality today. Which is more universal? I think it's a study of Zhuangzi?

Now people often say, don't they want to be a Buddhist youth?

In the knowledge of Laozi and Zhuangzi, this is inaction. In modern society, people are often under great pressure to survive, so many people feel very tired, so sometimes they wish they could live a more Buddhist life.

Laozi and Zhuangzi school also has a very applicable point of view, which is to look at things dialectically. In modern life, there are actually many things that we need to treat dialectically.