There are so many people to do, the times are developing, and artificial intelligence can replace it. The expert's theory is also unreliable. Look at this. The key is that people's life span has been prolonged and should be developed step by step. Population reduction can produce excellent children, and it is not necessary to have such a large population in the future to realize the replacement of labor force by intelligence. Mechanize as much as possible, the gradual decrease of population is a general trend and irreversible, and the idea of blindly pursuing demographic dividend should also be changed. Most of the so-called demographic dividend is just a data rushed out. Do we really need these data that much? A stable population is very important, and people's minds will become more and more open in the future. You said 600 million people are the best. Who can guarantee that some of the 600 million people think that 300 million people are the best? Slowly, more and more people are not born and fewer and fewer people are born.

In the 1960s, the population of China exceeded 600 million, and in the past 50 years, the population of China has doubled. What will be the population of China in 30 years? Don't worry about the population problem in China. The biggest problem in China is development. What China needs is the most powerful, sound, efficient and transparent legal system. This is the most difficult task for all China people, and nothing else is a problem. Just because there is no shortage of people now does not mean that there will be no shortage of people in the future. Now we are not married, and there are still so many divorces. Population decline is the trend. Who can I sell so many houses to?

The key is that many jobs will be replaced by machines in the future. What if so many people can't find jobs? Isn't it a more serious problem to wait for starvation or the state to raise them? China has abundant labor force, but there are too many low-skilled laborers, which enterprises don't want. China has a large population base, and the number of births is controlled over 30 years. In the short term, it is normal to have a great pressure on the elderly, but the ability of resources to carry the population has increased. As long as we do a good job in the skills training of the existing labor force and the education of the new generation of young middle schools and universities, there will be no shortage of labor force in China. Nowadays, education is not even popular in high schools (technical secondary schools). In addition, enterprises only hire people to make money, and do not invest in training skilled personnel reserves. Of course, skilled workers will be in short supply.

This problem can be alleviated after artificial intelligence, and it can be solved if the government's relative solutions are mature and implemented. The population of the United States is much smaller than that of China. People are not worried about such problems. It is unnecessary to draw the conclusion that aging in China will lead to insufficient pension. As long as the economy develops well, finance can solve it. Isn't the civil servant's pension from finance? The role of demographic dividend is only a dynamic factor of economic development. The population density of European and American countries is much less than that of China, but the per capita purchase is greater than that of China. So this problem can be solved.

In the vast rural world, there is basically no problem of aging, because we farmers are self-reliant from the beginning of participating in the old movement to the end of our lives. As long as people in the city reach retirement age, they can get something for nothing and get the support of the state. These talents are the problem of aging in China. It turned out that it was more appropriate to publicize China's 800 million population during family planning. When I was young, I just listened. Now it's less than 800 million. Aging is a process. If we want to have a population of 800 million, we must endure it. I don't think there is anything to worry about.

Should we consider aging? My parents' generation is 60 years old! And they have many brothers and sisters! If this batch arrives, it will leave us in large numbers in 20 years! Young people nowadays don't want children for various reasons! Can the younger generation replace our society at that time? As long as there are a certain number of high-quality young people, it is no problem to maintain sustainable innovation and development. With the popularization of robot automation in the future, there really won't be too many people in the future. Only by having fewer children can everyone have enough room to display.

How many people were there in the Qing Empire? Was it not defeated by the western countries with a much smaller population than him? What about the United States and Japan with a population of over 100 million in developed countries today? The pressure of providing for the aged brought by the aging population is easier to solve than other social pressures such as food security, energy crisis, education and transportation brought by the population aged 14. As the population decreases, the pressure on all aspects of society will also decrease. Although providing for the aged is also a big problem, as long as the population structure is reasonable, it will naturally be easier. If the problem of providing for the aged continues until the results are achieved, it will be even more difficult to solve.

At present, there is no shortage of labor in China. For the country, what is lacking is a high-quality population. Of course, for capitalists, what is lacking is cheap labor. It is ignorance to say that Japan's economy has been stagnant for 30 years. How can people still be developed countries if they have not moved for 30 years? Although the bursting of the real estate bubble has made Japan's economy less conspicuous than before, it really has nothing to do with population, not to mention that developed countries want cheap labor. There are many things in the world, and only underdeveloped countries can't remember their own. It's important to keep the population stable, but the more the population, the better. It is more important to maintain a reasonable and healthy population. Finally, the world can't afford a developed country with a population of 654.38+0.4 billion.

Good eugenics is the first choice. Everyone pollutes the environment, which is objective. Support for the elderly depends on oneself, and children are simply unreliable. Just raise yourself. Poor child training is a disaster for family and society. where is the money to come from? Where to work? Who can give a good solution? What about the room? Where is the land? Really? Are there so many resources? . Please refer to! The increase or decrease of population is directly proportional to the quality of life (spiritual material satisfaction)! The need to live and work in peace and contentment is rejected by the subdivision of social classes! The population crisis is just a bad start, and methods such as encouraging childbearing and paying for childbearing can only delay, treat the symptoms rather than cure the problem!

China people have a traditional idea that they want to have a prosperous population. However, the ultra-low family income and high birth cost force each couple to have only one child. Therefore, the government should encourage those rich people who need human resources to have more children. The decrease in the birth population is not worried about the total population, but a problem that seriously affects the population structure. Within a few years, China is a seriously aging country. With the increase of the elderly population, the amount of funds needed for old-age care increases, and the financial expenditure increases; When the population of young and middle-aged people decreases, wealth creation will decrease and fiscal revenue will decrease. Such an increase or decrease will lead to serious pension problems. When expenditure exceeds income, it will seriously affect the healthy development of the country. So I think, first, the pension should not be too high, and it is best to adjust it to around 3,000 yuan to ensure that the elderly have a better basic life. For example, the retirement wages of some units have increased year after year, and some have exceeded 5,000 yuan or even 1 10,000 yuan. Is it necessary? Second, the financial expenditure will be more inclined to children's education and medical care, and the burden of raising children will be effectively reduced, because children are the future of the country. Only by doing these two things can social development enter a virtuous circle, don't you think?

Luxury is easy, but it is not easy to accept it. The rich need the same proportion of the poor to support them. If the poor are not born, they need some people who are used to eating shark's fin and bird's nest to come back and eat steamed stuffed buns. This can't be solved by punching in and guessing singles and doubles. It can only be achieved by abnormally eliminating a group of people. This law has been followed throughout the ages. There are fewer newborns, longer life expectancy and more people aged 60. In the past, some people were born and some died of old age. Nowadays, there are very few births and many old people. In 30 years, we will all be old and not die after 80 or 90. Think about the social pressure at that time, the streets were full of old people shopping, no one was working, and there were few young people. There are only a few laborers in the country, and most of them eat subsistence allowances. At that time, it was useless to save the voluntary students. Even if they are born, they will have to work for 20 years.

Sending COVID-19 vaccine to overseas Chinese, some overseas Chinese have made a lot of contributions to China, while the unpatriotic minority. As the population of China increases, some of them will go abroad and develop overseas. Overseas Chinese have made great contributions to the alliance between China and other countries in the world. This will also contribute to the economic development of China. Robots can help you consume? Can robots carry out technological innovation? Can robots make theoretical discoveries? Population increase is just manpower increase? The increase in population means that more people are learning more advanced knowledge. Science and technology are the primary productive forces, and it is the easiest for young people to master science and technology. With the decrease of new population, fewer and fewer people have the latest knowledge, and the development of science and technology is becoming more and more unsustainable. This will lead to the decline of scientific and technological competitiveness, and then the decline of the country. China cannot afford such consequences. Do you think the plasticity of adults can be compared with that of young people?

I don't know what others think. Anyway, I think it's a good thing that the population has decreased. The most reasonable population in China is 600 million to 800 million, and now it is 654.38+0.4 billion. Shortage of resources, cheap labor, low people's happiness, high prices, housing, education, medical care, etc. Are all caused by overpopulation. Now we should reduce the population to a reasonable range as soon as possible, and then we can really enter a powerful socialist modern country. It is necessary to look at both immediate interests and sudden interests. In the case that there is basically no shortage of materials, people are the main new force and can play a key role at that time. After all, first of all, we must rely on ourselves, and we can't fight without too few people. "There are three unfilial, no great future" only considers personal responsibility to individuals, and increases the population to consider everyone's responsibility to everyone. Everyone needs a certain amount of probiotics to maintain and colonize.

If China's original traditional culture dominates the thinking of young people now, then China really doesn't need to worry. The key point is that the extreme freedom and hedonism of westerners now dominates the thinking of young people. China really needs to plan ahead. Westerners will only harm others for their own hedonism. China really needs to reflect on what it has gained in recent years. What have you lost? What we get is visible material changes, and what we lose is all the beauty left by our spiritual ancestors. Better and shorter than living, western culture, longer and more stable than living, look at China culture. Of course, some people will argue that a quality life, even if it is short-lived. You can sell your things on the black market, which will make you very rich in a short time in a year or two, but then you will be very poor. This is your favorite western culture.

Now experts worry that there are fewer and fewer young people in China, but they don't see more and more automated production lines, more and more intensive agricultural mechanization, and even more and more unmanned supermarkets, robot salons, driverless buses and robots replacing manual work in the service industry. The resources of the earth carrying population are limited, and the areas suitable for human habitation are also limited. Take a responsible family as an example. Before giving birth to a child, we should consider whether we can afford it, the education of the child and the survival when we grow up. If you don't have that condition, why give birth to a child and let him suffer? Why live!