According to relevant data, Yu Yue put forward his own views on the basis of denying Guo Xiang's statement in the Eastern Jin Dynasty (Guo Qingfan also used the same statement in later generations). According to Guo Xiangzhi, he thinks that "skills and experience are not bad, but the situation is very poor" should be understood as "skills are wonderful, always in the air, almost an obstacle" In the Tang Dynasty, Cheng further explained this statement: "The skill of the husband is wonderful, the obstacles are not observed, and the bones are not committed." According to them, "skill" should refer to "technology", "classic" should refer to "process" and "will" refers to small obstacles. Because this statement is vague and has many advantages, it is not adopted by future generations. However, if we carefully analyze it in the context, we will find that both Yu Yue's statement and Guo Xiang's statement are actually desirable. This is Guo's understanding of the phrase "technical classics are not bad", which is generally correct, but it is totally undesirable to talk about the word "technical classics". Yu said that it is correct to interpret "Shu" as "branch", but it is debatable to interpret "Shu Jing" as "meridian".
As we know, meridian is "Chinese medicine refers to the system that nourishes qi and blood, communicates the exterior and interior of the Tibetan government, and unifies the interior and exterior of the body." (4) "In other words, it is" the internal organs, external joints, and meridians that connect the whole body and run qi and blood. ⑤ But this passage can only be seen in the theory and practice of TCM diagnosis and treatment. Not only can it not be observed by empirical methods, but even with the rapid development of science and technology today, scientists can only indirectly prove its existence with the help of some cutting-edge instruments and some special means. Meridian is actually an unsolved mystery in modern anthropological science, which needs further understanding and research. That is to say, as far as anatomy is concerned, it doesn't exist at all. How can we talk about what Yu Yue said, "the connection between meridians will also hinder swimming"? Therefore, Zhong et al.' s translation of "South" objected to Yu Yue's statement when explaining this sentence, arguing that "there is no anatomical basis for how the' meridians' hinder the cutting". However, this book does not give an exact explanation of the word "technical classics", but only interprets the sentence "technical classics are willing to fail" as "my knife never touches the bones. "
So, what is the reasonable explanation of "technical success"? We believe that "technical classics" and "Ken" should actually be intertextual. The word "skill" used in Yu's theory should be interpreted as "branch", but it should be interpreted as other bones except the big bone. According to the sentence "It crosses its neck and branches" in Biography of Historical Records, it can be seen that the word "Jing" can be used as "iron" in ancient times, so it can be interpreted as "He". "Skills and classics are not bad" means "the knot of small bones, its knot with meat" and "skills and classics are not bad, but what is the situation?" Even the joints of small bones and the joints between bones and meat have never been touched, let alone put big bones on cattle. Therefore, the meaning of "technical and economic mistakes" should be the "festival" in the following sentence "those who have room for people". The real reason for "making mistakes in skills and classics" lies in "room for people, but the blade is not thick"
By the way, the word "Ken" in this sentence is often used as a metaphor for the key or key point of things, but as far as the original text is concerned, this metaphor is not very appropriate. Because for my master, the real key and key place when he understands cows should be the "clan" in "every clan". In my master's opinion, this should be a place where bones and muscles are intertwined.