Ms. Wen said that she is a member of a skin care center and often goes to the store to do fitness programs, while male technician Bumou often provides services for herself. On February 29th last year, 12, Ms. Wen did a body shaping project in the skin care center. During the period, Bumou told Ms. Wen whether to mention her hips. After Ms. Wen agreed, Bumou knelt down directly and met Ms. Wen in the privacy part.
Nervously, Ms. Wen asked what Bumou was doing, and Bumou left the room without saying anything. However, Ms. Wen did not call the police at that time, nor did she report the matter to the skin care center. She thought that Bumou would apologize to herself afterwards and she would not pursue the matter. But the next day, Bumou didn't apologize, which made Ms. Wen very angry and complained to the skin care center, demanding compensation of 20,000 yuan for mental damage compensation.
The skin care center said that they immediately verified with Bumou after receiving the complaint, and Bumou denied the existence of what Ms. Wen said. But after all, there are customer complaints. In order to calm down the incident, they fired Bumou. After that, Bumou left Qingdao and returned to his hometown. As for the 20,000 yuan requested by Ms. Wen, they said that they could only give 1 10,000 yuan. Among them, 5000 yuan is the remaining consumption amount of Ms. Wen's membership card, and the remaining 5000 yuan is their employees' contribution to compensate Ms. Wen.
What did you do after calling the police? At the same time, the skin care center said that there was monitoring in the involved room, but Ms. Wen had no feedback at that time, and the monitoring was automatically covered, which could not restore the truth. After the intervention of the local industrial and commercial bureau, the skin care center refunded 5000 yuan to Ms. Wen. The local police are also investigating Ms. Wen's experience and will deal with it according to law.
According to the existing evidence, will Bumou be considered obscene? If it is deemed obscene, does the skin care center have the obligation to compensate Ms. Wen? According to the facts described by Ms. Wen, Bumou's alleged illegal behavior is obscene. Indecency refers to the obscene behavior of the perpetrator to the victim except sexual intercourse in pursuit of sexual stimulation.
In this case, Bumou denied that he had done indecency to Ms. Wen, and Ms. Wen also claimed that she had been indecency. At the same time, the surveillance video at the time of the incident could not be recovered due to coverage reasons. The next step for the police is to summon Bumou to the case for further inquiry. At the same time, the police can also investigate whether there are witnesses at the time of the incident.
If, after investigation, Ms. Wen was the only one who said that there was no other evidence to support it, then the police would not consider that Bumou constituted indecency. In this case, Bumou is an employee of the skin care center, and his behavior occurred in the process of providing beauty services for Ms. Wen. Obviously in line with the above-mentioned situation of damage caused to Ms. Wen due to the execution of work tasks. Ms. Wen has the right to ask the skin care center to bear tort liability. At the same time, when the skin care center compensates, it can be held accountable to Bumou.
Of course, the above responsibilities are based on the premise that Bumou constitutes obscenity, which seems unknown now. The occurrence of this case reminds us that we must call the police for help in time after being infringed, so that the police can fix the evidence in time and claim their rights and interests. What do you think of this case?