Current location - Health Preservation Learning Network - Health preserving class - What are the identities of 1 to 9 in "The Big Wind Ploughs"?
What are the identities of 1 to 9 in "The Big Wind Ploughs"?
As follows:

The first one is: Princess Huaiqing, the eldest daughter of Emperor jing yuan, whose age is over ten. The appearance is beautiful and refined, just like a water lotus that is not demon.

The second place is: Li, a saint of Tianzong, who was a master of four products when he debuted. He wants to kill the dog emperor every day, and he has been acting in Yunzhou in his early days. He is a chivalrous man.

No.3 is: Xu Qi 'an, the fragment holder of Dishu No.3, nicknamed Bai Xupiao, Dafeng Da and Neptune. Modern police, who died of alcoholism, passed by Aote, the official office of Dafeng County faster. It was actually born to Xu and his royal descendants 500 years ago. Since childhood, I have been whored by my second uncle Xu and my aunt Li Ruyang.

Fourth place: Chu Huaizhen, the holder of the fourth fragment of the Earth Book and the champion of that year, abandoned literature and joined the army. Repairing a sword can hurt two things.

Fifth place: Lena, a girl from the Guli department.

No.6 is the great monk Huaiyuan.

No.7 is Li Lingshu, the son of Tianzong.

Asura of 8th grade, Lohan of Grade Two.

No.9 is Jinliantou, ranking first among the local people.

In addition to the above, princess royal described many details before the article: for example, the mirror suddenly fell out and was seen by princess royal.

The novel is summarized as follows: He took out the calligraphy signed by three great scholars from his sleeve. "thud ..." When the calligraphy slipped, there was a small jade mirror. Xu Xin-nian calmly picked it up, put away the small mirror and handed it in calligraphy. Princess royal took it, read it in calligraphy, and said faintly, "I know, but the Watchman's Gate belongs to the royal family, but I only listen to my father's words, and I can only do my best."

There are two possibilities. One is that the author implies that princess royal isNo. 1, and the other is that the author deliberately induces and diverts the reader's attention, and this detail is too obvious if princess royal ranks first. So I'm not sure who's number one.