99% of people who spread health knowledge are false. What vitamin C and shrimp can produce arsenic? Now many TV programs use experiments to prove that these conclusions are false. How many meals of shrimp and vitamin C do you have to eat to produce enough arsenic to poison you? News websites copy these health knowledge from meager resources, thinking that they can benefit mankind, including WeChat. If this health knowledge is true, why do we just find it now? Actually, I'm telling you, health knowledge with medical certificate is also false. For example, Baidu knows the morning paper that taking vitamin A to reduce heart attacks is only effective for 20% of people, which means that patients' heart diseases have nothing to do with vitamin A. However, investigators are biased against this conclusion, and some patients who are not good enough are considered to be good. Then it is best to exaggerate the experimental data by more than 50%. Vitamin A will definitely reduce heart attacks, and so will health books. The book is written casually by the publishing house, and only the content is enough. They package and sell them. This kind of book is called junk book. The contents of junk books include philosophy, stock trading and medical care.
In this regard, I think it's enough to trust a mother with health knowledge. When did our mother live as a child? Most of the knowledge she gave is 90% reliable.
3. Exposing a person, such as a teacher, a doctor, a city manager, killing a cat, a patient and a vendor, even TV news reports are not credible. This kind of news reported on the Internet is basically false. The general title is "xxxx has done something extraordinary for xxXX as XX". Generally, if there is no positive photo of this person attached to the news, then the news must be false. Even the mug shots of the suspects were not made public or even interviewed. What about exposing, discovering the truth and paying attention to people's livelihood? I just want to raise the ratings and arouse public anger. How can I be sure? I am a junior three student. My physics teacher was reported by former students. She killed the cat, forged surveillance videos, exposed the TV station and told them that the teacher did it. As a result, a bunch of people embellished Weibo, which alarmed the Cat-loving Association, blocked our school every day and demanded that our physics teacher be expelled, and even complained to the Education Bureau. It's really ridiculous. Our physics teacher is very kind and responsible for teaching. After winning the eighth place in the class, she became the second, soft-hearted and strict with poor students. Our physics teacher is still good, and our school didn't help her clarify. She volunteered. She doesn't want people to know that there is such a student among our 40 students. I can even tell you that her name is Bi Ailing, and there are news of scolding her all over the Internet, even monitoring, but she just can't keep her face down. It is obviously not our teacher Bi who is being watched. At that time, Mr. Bi's hair was much longer than that of the woman being watched. She keeps her hair. Reporters criticized her everywhere without even interviewing her. I hate such junk news, and I hate those animal protection associations that use netizens' comments to denounce the victims in Weibo, saying that cruel teachers should not be allowed to lead bad students. It is better to donate money to people who have no money to eat than to have money to serve animals. The playground of our school is very small, and the nail houses around it have not moved away, nor can they be expanded, so they can't help us deal with it. How about firing a physics teacher with strong teaching ability to improve students' learning environment? There are also people who expose urban management for beating hawkers. They can expose the killing of hawkers by urban management all over the country every day. There are only a few hundred urban management in Guangzhou, and it is a crowded city. How much is a * * * in China? Wow, nearly one third of the urban management in China killed and maimed people. Is that right? Moreover, some TV stations have exposed some small news networks to take some photos of traffic accidents before. Some people fell to the ground and were put on the Internet, saying that some urban management beat people. Fake, fake are all fake, even the names and looks of urban management team members are fake? How dare you slander Chinese urban management team members? Urban management does have these bad behaviors, but they are not frequent. Even if it happens sometimes, don't always denigrate others. There are also examples of doctors treating the dead. Everyone knows the writer Chai Jing, right? In the past, a hospital in Guangzhou had a department to treat a child's rare disease. A parent's child got an incurable disease and died, so the parents went to the doctor for trouble. Chai Jing sympathized with the parents, wrote letters accusing the doctors and used the news media. As a result, this department failed to withstand the pressure of public opinion and closed down. The doctor has gone abroad. Since then, all the local children with this rare disease have been cured, and the only doctor who can cure them can only walk. There is more than one such example. We can't directly scold the news media for many tragedies. Let's think about why the news media do this and exaggerate the facts, just to arouse our anger, let us create public opinion, and they will make money. Therefore, when we watch the news, we should adjust our mentality and what we see, first calm our hearts and rationally analyze some social phenomena. Not all social phenomena are the fault of the government. Don't scold anything in online news comments and Weibo's comments. If you scold, it will be chaotic. Less scolding will help reduce the bad social atmosphere. Now many people who surf the internet feel that they are just, ah! When I see something bad, I curse death. See good things and scold "what's the big deal?" We often don't know the truth, but we are defending the justice in our hearts. How many people forget that they are part of society when they curse this society. We do our job well, and everyone does his part. No, it can be said that we are not doing our duty and are not angry, which is to maintain the peace of the press. If no one pays attention to this seemingly similar fake news, what can the media send at the risk of being investigated? Really, life is short. To be yourself is to safeguard the progress of mankind.
? The fake news we read is basically divided into three categories, and our emotions are also affected by the above three categories.
4. It's good to watch news and TV, with a reliability of 95%. How significant is online news? A car model should also be on the news, and a female student who has been admitted should also be on the news. Many people's first reaction after watching the news is to scold and comment at sixes and sevens, polluting the soul. I suggest you watch the news online less, which is very inefficient.