However, if many people go to a place to provide for the elderly, such a way of providing for the elderly will certainly be strongly opposed by the local people. Because of the completely different living behaviors and habits between urban and rural areas, a large number of urban elderly people suddenly come to live in a small mountain village, which will definitely disrupt their quiet life and bring them a lot of inconvenience.
To tell the truth, people in some cities are not welcomed by simple rural people.
You are arrogant when you hold a group.
It is a good idea for city people to set up an old people's group in the countryside or suburbs. Advocating this move has far-reaching significance and many benefits. It is not only feasible, but also charming and enviable, and it is worth trying to popularize.
Over the past 40 years of reform and opening up, the rural landscape has undergone earth-shaking and gratifying changes. The living environment in suburbs and most rural areas is not what it used to be. Both material life and spiritual and cultural life have been greatly improved compared with the past, and the hardware and software facilities are not much worse than those in the city. Water, electricity, gas, communication, and network have entered thousands of households. Traffic extends in all directions, every village has access to highways, and many farmers live in buildings and buy cars. The rural market is prosperous, and vegetables and foods are original and environmentally friendly.
The countryside is far away from the noisy city and industrial pollution, with green mountains and green waters, idyllic scenery and fresh air. Rural houses, mostly bungalow structures, face south and have single-family houses. The house is spacious, with large space in front of and behind the house and sufficient lighting. Living environment is the dream of many city people. Many rural elderly also benefit from a good ecological environment.
Old people in cities live in groups in rural areas, either living in groups or living freely in scattered areas. Most of the old people were born at the same time, with the same age, social experience, psychological feelings, topic language and hobbies. Live together, live together, chat together, have fun together and taste together. Natural happiness, comfort, health and longevity.
In fact, the urban elderly retired to the countryside to provide for the elderly, and there were early pioneers. Some go back to the countryside to live, and some go to the countryside to visit relatives and friends. In recent years, it has become more popular. Some go to the countryside to build houses, and some go to the countryside to buy houses and rent houses. Rural natural scenery is good, comfortable and quiet, without noise and environmental pollution, and life is relaxed and free. It is a blessed place for the elderly to gather health, fitness, leisure, entertainment and spend their old age safely. In a word, it is promising and beneficial for the physically active elderly to support the elderly in rural areas, which is worth advocating and supporting.
In my opinion, it is feasible for city people to set up an old people's group in the countryside or suburbs. First, it can promote the rapid development of rural pension, reduce the negative impact and social burden of society, and promote the nationalization and government of rural pension. Second, urban people have accumulated a certain pension foundation. They have a unique advantage in going to the suburbs or the agricultural government. Integrating the advantages here into rural or suburban areas will benefit people's livelihood, give a strong impetus and be conducive to the development of social pension. Third, going to the suburbs or rural areas will promote the rapid development of food, clothing, housing and transportation in rural areas, thus promoting cultural exchanges between agriculture, rural areas and farmers and realizing complementary advantages.
The so-called group pension means that many elderly people live together and take care of each other, and the disabled elderly are taken care of by healthy young people. In that case, why go to the countryside? Although the environment in rural areas is better, the conditions of medical care, food and housing are far worse than those in cities. Once the elderly have cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, it is too late to go to a regular hospital for rescue. Why bother?
If you are a young old man who has just retired and has his own house in the countryside, it is still a good choice to plant some small vegetable gardens, raise some poultry, see the green mountains and green waters and breathe fresh air.
Under the age of 80, healthy old people can go to the countryside to support the elderly.
The location should be chosen in a place with mountains and water and convenient transportation. Where there are mountains and water, there are trees. The air here is moist and fresh, which is a treasure place for the elderly.
In my spare time, I climb mountains, fish, grow vegetables and flowers. You'd better buy a bike, and it's also a beautiful thing to travel by bike.
Sick and sick, it is best for the elderly over 80 to choose a place near the hospital for the elderly. There are many senile diseases. If you can get to the hospital one minute earlier, you may say a lot, and the consequences are hard to say.
In short, no matter what kind of old-age care is adopted, as long as you are happy.
Hello, I'm glad to answer this question. You ask the city people, is it feasible to support the elderly in rural areas or suburbs? I think it is very good and feasible.
First, it solves the problem that the cost of old-age care institutions is high and they can't afford to live. Holding a group to support the elderly can rent a relatively large yard in the countryside, with several people or dozens of people as a group. Usually, you can make a living by yourself or hire local farmers to help you. The cost is relatively low and you can generally afford it.
The second is to solve the problem of loneliness. Generally, it is inconvenient for the elderly to travel in the city, and more often they are at home. The problem of holding a group to support the elderly can be better solved. When living together, there are always people chatting together, doing activities together and living with a smile.
Third, we can grow vegetables, raise chickens, do what we can, pick some wild vegetables, cook something delicious and enjoy the rural life.
Fourth, the forms can be varied, and they can live seasonally or all year round. As long as the supporting conditions are good, permanent residence or short-term residence is good.
Fifth, it is best to have all kinds of experience, at least there are emergencies that can be dealt with urgently, so this problem is very important, otherwise some emergencies are very troublesome.
Sixth, pay attention to the form of providing for the aged, so as not to arouse the resentment of local residents. It is good to hold a group to support the elderly, but after all, city people and farmers have different concepts, so we should pay attention to the differences between men and women, and avoid suspicion no matter how old we are, otherwise we will not live long.
Holding a group for the aged involves many problems, such as expenses, children's visits, medical security, peacetime disputes, food hygiene, division of labor and cooperation. Be prepared in advance and give full consideration to the problems encountered. In addition, some people need selfless dedication, management and coordination. Ideal is good, but it will also cause problems. As long as we work together, there will always be a good old-age life.
A: Everything (including the environment) can be done if conditions permit.
Very feasible.
I'm trying.
I have talked about this idea many times with several friends who hit it off. As far as I know, we are not the only small group that makes such calculations and discussions.
We can't decide not to do it
We are miserable post-70s. When we have the ability, the country will not let us have a second child. When the state requires us to have a second child, we can't have one.
I really don't have the energy to raise any more children.
Therefore, we are bound to face such embarrassment: a family composed of two only children, a small family, what will our life be like, and we have to undertake the task of providing for the elderly for four people.
Even if the child does not refuse, we are reluctant to part with it.
What we can do is to arrange and design a realistic, reasonable and feasible way of providing for the aged before we are old enough to make a difference.
This way is to provide for the aged.
Our slogan is: help each other, don't bother the children, and don't bother them. To tell the truth, it's not that we haven't considered the way to enter the nursing home-live by ourselves when we can still move, and go to the nursing home when we can't move and wait for that day.
But then I thought, "since we can go to a nursing home, why can't we run our own nursing home?" Little friends who have played together since childhood can form a nursing home when they are old.
As for the location, operation mode, etc. You can't eat hot tofu if you are impatient. Let's discuss it slowly!
Therefore, I think it is completely feasible for urban people to go to the countryside or suburbs to hold a group for the elderly in the future, and it is the general trend!
Thanks for browsing. See you next time.
This is necessary. It is not only the need of providing for the aged, but also considering the epidemic situation and international security situation this year. Dense population is unfavorable. The severe challenge of human living space should be transformed into natural dispersion, more livable, more scientific and reasonable. Conditionally move to the countryside to live, and plant some vegetables in front of and behind the house. The environment is quiet, the air is ventilated, there are many natural water sources and green vegetation, which are suitable for health care and old-age care.
It is indeed a good method worth exploring. First of all, with China gradually entering the aged society, the issue of providing for the aged has been put on our agenda. There are many one-child families now, so you can't let your children wait for you to get off work. Everything must be objective, considering the affordability of both the elderly and the children's families.
It is very expensive to find a nanny in Beijing now. You gave all your pension to the nanny. I'm afraid people won't come. If you don't want to do something special, you really can't maintain the life of the elderly. It may be ok for children to get 300~500 yuan a month. How much you get may affect the stability of your child's family.
Now let's go back to the crux of the problem. There are probably 10 people going to the countryside to provide for the elderly, which is not much. It should be cheap to rent a yard in the countryside. Find another rural person to do odd jobs and rent out the house in the city. Don't tell me about retirement here. How many old people's property has this house robbed? Today, we only talk about providing for the aged. 10 people, there should be 5 suites for rent. This money should be enough to cover these expenses. Even if it is not enough, everyone will have a pension as compensation.
There should be a system for supporting the elderly by holding a group, which is a loose combination, allowing people to enter and leave, and allowing new members to join if there are contradictions. Let's make an agreement and abide by it together, but we must never haggle over every ounce. If you haggle over every ounce, it won't last long, and there is a danger of breaking up. Taking this way of providing for the aged is a discussion in itself, and it is also a way to find a suitable way of providing for the aged in China. That is, to meet the interests of children and the needs of the elderly, the government should give strong support.