In the outline of the examination, the ability to answer and put forward countermeasures is usually expressed as "the ability to ask and solve problems" or "the ability to solve problems". That is, "on the basis of understanding and analyzing the given data, it is required to find and define the problem, make an evaluation or balance, and put forward solutions or measures to solve the problem." It is worth noting that "putting forward" here is not aimless thinking, nor is it making up slogans out of thin air. Instead, when answering, we need to respect the materials, take the materials as the core, make scientific and reasonable ideas, integrate the main points of countermeasures, and finally propose solutions to the problems.

When answering the countermeasure questions, we should make clear the basic requirements, that is, the scoring standard should be clear. Review the requirements, follow the materials, find the problems, clarify the problems, and then put forward countermeasures. The first is pertinence. Everyone knows that it is aimed at the problem. What is a "problem"? In fact, it is all kinds of contradictory factors shown by some social phenomena reflected in the materials. What we need to do is to analyze the specific problems, and we need to put ourselves in the shoes to find the problems more accurately. In recent years, "pertinence" often requires candidates to clarify the theme of countermeasures, that is, to clarify whose problem it is and whose problem to solve. For example, in the first question of 20 16, the given data 1 mentioned that "entrepreneurial success is a small probability event". According to the given data 1, please make suggestions on how to improve the success rate of college students' entrepreneurship. This topic is a typical countermeasure against a certain subject itself, which should be discussed around the college students themselves. All the problems in the materials should be analyzed from the perspective of college students, and the low success rate of entrepreneurship is its own reason. The five college students introduced in the first paragraph and Xiao Yang introduced in the second paragraph are all explicit college students' tips in the materials, all indirect countermeasures, and all pushed back by questions. In the rest of the paragraphs, some authoritative figures describe the * * * problems existing in the current college students' entrepreneurial process and give reasonable suggestions. The difficulty of this question is moderate, and the core question of the material is also provided from the perspective of college students. The third question of 20 17 is more difficult on the basis of 20 16, which gives more interference to candidates. The topic is according to data 4 and 5, please make suggestions on how citizens should enhance their safety awareness and improve their safety prevention ability. This topic once again cuts into the targeted theme, as far as citizens are concerned, how to enhance their safety awareness, that is, how to improve their preventive ability. There is a lot of disturbing information in this question. In Material 4, many candidates gave answers to the problems of "black technology" software, network "black market", high rate of network violation, reactionary remarks and citizens' travel in financial resources, network fund security, medical and health chaos and so on. However, this question has always stressed that the subject of the answer is very targeted, that is, citizens, citizens can not carry out relevant supervision and severe punishment. What we do is to prevent ourselves from these serious problems.

Feasibility is usually to analyze whether the countermeasures can be implemented when facing practical problems. It requires that the countermeasures put forward by candidates can not be empty talk, but can really solve practical problems. In the theoretical part, we all know that we must first comply with the policy provisions and be able to fully implement them. However, in practice, candidates' countermeasures are often encountered. For example, farmers in a certain place are lazy, don't farm, and rely on important ideas to survive, resulting in a lack of economic resources, while some students will take out application funds to give subsidies ... completely ignoring laws and regulations and economic costs, it is not feasible to take countermeasures. Secondly, we should emphasize the feasibility with the majority of candidates, and consider whether the countermeasures can be implemented and whether the subject of implementation has the conditions and ability to solve them. Finally, combining the above two points, before implementing the countermeasures, we should estimate the final effect, comprehensively consider it and make a scientific and reasonable evaluation.

In fact, this is also a comprehensive survey and puts forward countermeasures. Only by defining the important scoring standards such as pertinence and feasibility can the countermeasures hit the nail on the head and hit the problem directly. In addition, candidates are also advised to pay more attention to current political hotspots, participate in social practice and observe the details of life in their daily preparation. Keep abreast of the latest topics and real-time trends in various fields around the society, so as to improve the ability to solve practical problems and increase the confidence to break through and put forward countermeasures.