Current location - Health Preservation Learning Network - Health preserving class - I am very confused when I ask Chinese medicine practitioners if they believe it or not.
I am very confused when I ask Chinese medicine practitioners if they believe it or not.
Pseudoscience-calling unscientific things science.

Traditional Chinese medicine is completely scientific, with insufficient evidence, completely unscientific and insufficient evidence. How can it be called pseudoscience? Moreover, the goal of TCM today is to make TCM scientific and standardized, but it does not mean that it is science. It's not fake Evolution is an incomplete scientific theory, and many arguments are not empirical, so it has not been written into various textbooks as science; Even more in physics. The nature of magnetic field is not clear today, and the theory surrounding magnetic field is not as scientific as before. According to them, all this is pseudoscience? Furthermore, Pluto was once a planet, and it was once a planet with conclusive evidence. What about today? Science advances in doubt. They can't explain the theory of traditional Chinese medicine with what they call "science" and come to the conclusion that traditional Chinese medicine is unscientific. Their so-called "science" is not completely in line with the objective laws, but also the subjective understanding of things by human beings. Anything that can't be explained is labeled as pseudoscience and unscientific, which is unscientific in itself.