Agree with the upstairs, the landlord's invention is reasonable in principle, and it is probably impossible to enter the market for practical use. The reason is that the opinions upstairs are clear enough. By the way, the authorization of utility model patent does not mean anything. Authorization of invention patents is the first step to truly prove the success of your invention. Few authorized invention patents can survive in the market. The idea of pedal power generation is very rich. If it can be done, products will be available as early as 10 years ago. . . .

One of the benefits you said is that it is even worse to maintain the battery. The unstable voltage and current of the pedal are connected in parallel with the power supply, which is completely increasing the burden of the power supply. In this way, the power supply will collapse faster and the battery will be recharged many times. You are equivalent to charging the power supply at any time, but it is unstable. It is strange that the battery is not broken. . .

Instead, you change it, use the electricity generated by the pedal to other aspects, such as car lights, and use pedal electricity instead of battery electricity, which also achieves the effect of saving electricity, but the problem is still one: the disadvantage of pedal power generation is that the voltage is unstable, which will damage electrical products at any time. . .