Classic trap type: 1. In time sequence problems, traps are often set by comparing present and past situations. Candidates should pay special attention to a series of words that indicate the time sequence, such as once, past, many years ago, present, present and future. For example, in the renting scene, the landlord will say that there were five people living here before, and then two left, so now there are only three people living here, and the question is about how many people live in the house now, so the answer should naturally be three instead of five. For example, when introducing the facilities, a fitness club said that there is only a gym now and a swimming pool will be opened in the future. When asked what facilities the club has, the answer can only be the gym. 2. A series of data reports often appear in numerical comparison questions, which makes many candidates have a headache, especially when there are more data or it is difficult to explain the data. The words that attract attention are: minimum, maximum, minimum, maximum, maximum and so on. For example, in a tourist scene, it will be said that the number of a tour group is usually around 30, but there will also be a small group of 20 people in the off-season and 40 people in the peak season. If you ask how many people are in the exam group, you can fill in 40. 3. Information splitting Sometimes a complete information will be split into two halves during the exam, and attention should be paid to integrating the two aspects of information when answering questions. The key words are not obvious. For example, in the school scene, the teacher said that there were 20 boys and 30 girls in this class. In the face scene, the interviewer said that he had lived in new york for five years and Seattle for two years. The total number of people in that class and the time spent living in the United States should be the sum of two data. 4. The trap of information selection often occurs in the conversation between two people, which shows that one person lists a lot of information for another person to choose, and the other person makes a decision after evaluating it. Attention:? Should I make a decision, Don? T want to and others came up with the usage of decision and some adjectives to express evaluation. At this time, it is necessary to distinguish who is the decision maker, and the tone of the decision maker has certain hints. For example, for travel goods, one party said that sunscreen, kettle and sweater should be brought, while the other party said that sunscreen was necessary because he was going to the seaside to bask in the sun, but the kettle took up too much space. If it was him, he would take a raincoat instead of a sweater. Then the things to bring behind are sunscreen and raincoat. 5. There will be conflicts between subjective will and objective facts in subjective and objective test questions. At this time, we should pay attention to words such as universal, common, thinking and planning. For example, the interviewer asked how long he would stay, and the interviewer replied that he usually studied in school for three years, but planned to complete all the courses in two years. Then the student decided to stay for two years. The interference of similar information usually leads to losing points because of its concealment. At this time, the obvious distinguishing words are: we, them and other pronouns. For example, when introducing courses, they said that their university offered engineering and business courses, while another nearby university was famous for its liberal arts. Liberal arts should be the answer to eliminating interference. The implication is that this trap is more difficult and generally needs to be understood to do the problem. For example, in the process of renting a house, the landlord asked the visitor if he would like to share a room with others. The visitor replied that if he wanted to get a degree, he needed to concentrate on his studies. If he lives with others, there will be a lot of interference. Then he hinted that he wanted a single room. This trap is not disturbing, but there are some changes in parts of speech between the words in the original text and the answer words required to be filled in, which is difficult to convert. It is common to fill in the column of personal information, which should be filled in the form of adjectives, but the original listening text is usually reported in the form of nouns. More complex problems will be transformed with more. For example, a man said that he was born in London and his mother was Spanish. Later, he came to America. The answer at this time should be British. Trap prediction: If students know the above traps in advance, they will know fairly well when answering questions, and many traps have certain implications for their own examination questions. Students can prepare themselves by analyzing the examination questions. The following analysis of several obvious trap tips. The total annual expenses of insurance _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ indicates the total expenses, and there may be information classification traps. The fine starts from the maximum number of groups _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Collect data from at least _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ objects, and at most, at least all objects indicate that there may be a numerical comparison trap. At this time, it is easy to answer questions as long as you look for size data according to the prompts. Current course _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _1r "AE+I! N% n8[ current expected residence time _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _] is a common hint of timing traps. Annual membership fee (no current student card): _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Generally, such determiners are limited by time and place, and their expressions are adjectives, adverbs, adverbials of time, adverbials of place, and additional information in brackets.