Current location - Health Preservation Learning Network - Fitness coach - Who is better, Wuhan University, Xi Jiaotong University, National University of Singapore or Nanyang Technological University?
Who is better, Wuhan University, Xi Jiaotong University, National University of Singapore or Nanyang Technological University?
Both universities are very good universities, but according to our future career plan, our choices will be different. If you want to stay abroad for postgraduate study and get employment in China in the future, there is no problem with the recognition of Wuhan University. If you want to apply for overseas graduate students or go overseas for internship/work in the future, National University of Singapore and Nanyang Technological University are better. You can accept your own budget and future career planning. What suits you is the best. In addition, no matter which university you graduated from, you will still look at your comprehensive ability when you finally find a job. Therefore, no matter which university you go to, it is strongly recommended that you make good use of the resources of the school and strive to improve yourself.

How can you compare the best universities in Xi 'an, Wuhan and Harbin with the best universities in another country, even with the population? Not to mention that these two schools are not much worse than the resumption of diplomatic relations between Qing and North China, then the population of Henan and Shandong is even larger. You should compare schools in Henan and Shandong with those in Singapore. These schools you mentioned are really good, but the two roads are completely different. One is a top university in China, and the other is a top university abroad, with different educational concepts. Aside from other things, Poer's ranking can be compared with that of Qingbei. If you want to stay abroad, this is a good idea.

First, according to Ruben (most of the 985 and 2 1 1CS strong schools scored at least B+), so it is. Not only CS, but also many disciplines are such cutting-edge knowledge. Well-designed courses are responsible, and the top teachers in the industry have the most important learning environment in which healthy competition is not involved, which is not comparable to 985. Look at the objective factors such as hardware facilities, campus environment and international environment ranking. I don't know how many streets are left in China.

To tell the truth, there are still many students in the lab of the Institute of Technology here. I've been a little devastated since Secondary Nine. The hardware of NUS is good. In the past, school hardware could play 985, which was not as good as this. Send out two self-test packages every week (why do you say that because Nantah wants to buy it itself, and it will be quite expensive after a long time). The canteen is delicious and the price is reasonable, which is cheaper than Hong Kong. There are many choices (I have been to Hong Kong three times). All swimming pools and gyms are equipped with professional facilities, and rock climbing, tennis, stick ball and dance studio can be booked free of charge. The academic atmosphere is strong, and the library is also five-star. You can sit in the open-air seat downstairs of the science and technology institute for discussion or self-study. There are giant fans in the corridor.

Second, utown has an endless swimming pool, where you can get together to bask in the sun and make reservations for all MAC study rooms. There is still too much to discuss in software, so let's talk about teachers. He can become the first in qs Asia, and I believe his average teacher is no worse than Qingbei. Let's talk about when China will become a prosperous country (a wise tiger is just around the corner). Output, every year, the big magazines in domestic colleges and universities are basically the kind of news in hospitals and schools. The laboratory journals here are basically assembly lines, the kind that are rolled to death.

I believe that a doctor's offer from Qingbei and NUS is in front of me. As long as the tutor of NUS is not too bad, I will undoubtedly choose the latter, which is why many top universities in China choose to study here, but there is almost no reverse learning. The disadvantage is that cherry blossoms are not as good-looking as those of Wu Da, which I don't think I have ever seen in school. Moreover, remote sensing is not as good as Wu Da. After all, Wu Da is the first in remote sensing in Asia, but there are not many universities that open remote sensing colleges, so he doesn't. Unfortunately.

Third, Wu Da's class is that teachers watch ppt and students take notes. This model is score-oriented. Many classes are old and out of touch with the industry. Many teachers' classes don't attract me. I still have to spend a lot of time on self-study and a lot of coding homework. You can find it on any GitHub. No desire to write from scratch. Ask the teacher. Sometimes teachers can't write code. The teachers in NUS are top-notch, all graduated from Ivy League, and have published many cutting-edge articles in related fields. Their coding ability is also first-class, and their lectures are very clear. They take us step by step to experience every detail, and their homework can also make us shine. It is completely impossible to find the topic of every event on the Internet, from 0->; 1 is done in the form of a group, which is very challenging and interesting. After the teacher's shocking design, the coding ability has been greatly improved. And it is very important that people will not recite various concepts or brush questions in order to get more points, but actually learn the knowledge itself and use it!

Fourth, any contribution made by Wuhan University, Kexi Transportation and Harbin Project to * * * and China can kill him. China Nine Schools Alliance has trained a large number of talents for * * * and made the country's comprehensive industrial products rank first in the world, and its comprehensive industrial output value ranks first in the world. At the beginning of the founding of New China, we could not strike matches, produce chemical fertilizers or produce chemical fibers. The Japanese did not find oil in China, the Soviets said that China could not produce oil, and China insisted on refining oil from the desert. A virus, a conflict and a trade friction made Nanyang Technology very painful. Major rankings, esi, and natural indexes are also truly reflected. Unfortunately, the losses were heavy. In addition to its great advantages in setting up disciplines, Singapore has a lot of cooperation with foreign countries, especially its close academic exchanges with China, which keeps the stability of the school's discovery, and it can be regarded as getting on the bus, and its ability to resist risks is relatively strong. The school is located in Huaxia, and there are basically no opponents except five people in North China.

We must establish the self-confidence of characteristic universities. Yes, Wuhan University of Science and Technology and Harbin Institute of Technology are many times better than those two idiots in Singapore, not to mention the stable improvement of China's economy and people's livelihood. I think getting 70 points in these universities is happier than getting full marks in two schools in Singapore. I feel it is meaningless to simply compare the strength of the school now. If you want to develop on the international stage, go to Singapore. If you just want to go to college step by step in China to find a job, it's 985 in China. But after all, you should choose a good major. Many tiankeng majors in northern Qing Dynasty are not doing well. More than 60% of my 985 civil engineering students have a bad life.