In this case, the situation is very embarrassing for the property, because the property has no law enforcement power, and in the face of complaints from residents, the property can only persuade and prompt. Moreover, both sides are owners. One side wants to exercise and the other side wants to recuperate. Neither side can offend, so there will be a phenomenon of property neglect. It is suggested to start from the following aspects, so that the square dance can continue to dance without disturbing the people:

First, dancers can go to the square nearest to the community to dance and turn down the music. This can satisfy the dance without disturbing the people. And not far from home, it is not a problem for the elderly.

Second, do a good job of coordination, live in a community, everyone has old people and children at home, and everyone should understand and understand each other. For example, dancing in the square dance in the community can reduce the volume and try not to disturb the people. Residents close to the dancers should take good care of the doors and windows in the morning and evening, and try their best to make sound insulation and avoid interference.

Third, the property department, urban management department and environmental protection department should do a good job in related functions. The employees of these departments should have foresight, solve problems that may occur in public places in time, and do a good job in service.

Article 2 of China's Tort Liability Law has stipulated: "Anyone who infringes on civil rights and interests shall bear tort liability in accordance with this Law." It doesn't ask whether the infringer's behavior violates the prohibition of the law. As long as it infringes on the civil rights and interests of others, it should bear legal responsibility. On the subject of infringement, the dancers who disturb the People's Square may constitute the possibility of infringement. As long as the right to rest is infringed, you can sue for legal relief, and the judicial department should also investigate the responsibility according to law, instead of taking a "laissez-faire" attitude.