Current location - Health Preservation Learning Network - Fitness coach - Gym record sheet
Gym record sheet
The gym changed the service place without authorization, which affected the legitimate rights and interests of consumers. After the gym charges related fees, it informs consumers of the change of service place by unilateral announcement, which affects the legitimate rights and interests of consumers. If the negotiation fails, the consumer can terminate the contract and ask the gym to refund the fee.

? The cause of the incident was that Mr. Li bought a private fitness class in a gym not far from home for the convenience of fitness, and the two sides signed a personal coaching service contract; Mr. Liu paid a one-time service fee of 6000 yuan. The two parties agreed in the contract that "30% of the money will be used to pay all the expenses of the training program in one lump sum from the date of payment and cannot be refunded for any reason". Later, after operating for a period of time, the gym never opened again, and the customer was informed of the change of service location by SMS. As the new service location is far away from Mr. Li's home, Mr. Li asked for a refund from the gym, but the two sides failed to reach an agreement, and Mr. Li appealed to the court; If the gym unilaterally changes its service location, can consumers ask for a refund?

? The gym replied that according to the membership terms in the membership application form, Mr. Li had no right to unilaterally terminate the contract. Gyms in this area have indeed closed down and moved to other areas, but we informed our customers when we moved and had a new solution; Mr Li Can continues to receive services in other stores, so he doesn't agree to refund, let alone pay interest.

? After hearing the final result, the court held that according to the membership card record issued by the gym to Mr. Li, both parties had a clear agreement on the place of performance of the contract. Now that the gym is closed, it is impossible to perform the contract with Mr. Li, and Mr. Li has the right to terminate the contract according to law; After the contract is terminated, the gym should refund the remaining advance payment. Because there is no contract, Mr. Li's claim for interest is not supported. Finally, the court ruled that the gym refunded Mr. Li 3200 yuan. After the verdict was pronounced, neither party appealed and the verdict came into effect.