What puzzles me most is that there is no "knowledge increment", and the analysis and narration are too shallow.
The so-called knowledge increment means that readers have new cognition and new inspiration on the original cognition, giving readers a kind of "can this be done?" "Why didn't I think of that!" This feeling.
The failure to give readers "knowledge increment" mainly lies in their insufficient reserves, insufficient investment and lack of in-depth thinking.
Dudu will disassemble an article every day and write a mind map to share with you. While being altruistic, it is also a good way to urge yourself to constantly increase new knowledge.
It is also a good way to keep reading and write reading notes. My difficulty is that I can only take notes and golden sentences mechanically, and I can't transform them.
It is a good method to mention imitation in some methodologies. Imitate first, then innovate. There are so many excellent works of "everyone" that imitation is actually necessary.
After careful analysis, I actually didn't act. I know many methods, but I did too little.
I recently signed up for a fitness class and a beauty class. I'm not so serious and active in class, just to finish punching in. There is no real learning, no real absorption, no absorption, no transformation.
It is still necessary to correct the learning attitude in order to better increase the "knowledge increment" for yourself.