First, the obvious heat. This woman's behavior is obviously suspected of heat, because it has nothing to do with him. He took a video on the internet just to attract everyone's attention. After this incident, most voices are accusing the graduate students, so when the woman supports the graduate students, there will be a burst of scolding, behind which he can pay more attention. This woman's language is no better than that of the graduate student who abused dogs. On the contrary, his language stimulated many people's hearts. Many people think that he is not worthy to be a female doctoral student. His language and education are seriously inconsistent, and his psychology is even more distorted than that of the dog abuser.
Second, there is a big problem with the three views! There are other problems with the three views of language in this woman's video. Not only does he think that a dog's life is worthless, but he also thinks that it is wrong to accuse the hostess of graduate students. He felt that it was the fault of the woman who pointed out that the video of graduate students abusing dogs, and the woman humiliated the man in her family. The two should divorce and let the woman take the dog out to sleep. This shows that this woman's ideas are extreme. His ideas are different from ours. Up to now, he still thinks that a dog's life is worthless. If this woman is really a doctoral student at Peking University, Peking University should investigate the psychological state of these students. It can be seen that the psychology of this female doctoral student has distorted herself, and her offline behavior may be extremely extreme.
A high degree of education does not mean that this person is of high quality. If this female doctoral student is really such a person, then even if she enters the society in the future, it will not bring good influence.