Humans are not creatures that exist only for reproduction. Although people on the earth are dinks, human beings will be extinct, but obviously this is impossible. After all, there are very few real dinks.
In my opinion, to live a good life is to try our best to realize the high value of living and make positive contributions to the family and society. This is the most responsible performance. As for having children, it is human instinct. Most people can have children easily without any effort, let alone take exams.
If we shift the energy of having children to the improvement of our work or personal ability, and then make greater contributions to society, and shift the tasks of having children and reproducing human beings to people with weaker abilities and less contributions to society, isn't it that everyone works together to create a better society and then make the world peaceful ... Then how can Dink be selfish? Moreover, according to authoritative surveys, people who generally choose Dink are generally upper-middle class …
There is no hereditary title to inherit in ancient times. As long as you have a son who abides by the law, you can eat whatever you want for generations without working. So I often see people asking others to have children under the pretext of carrying on the family line. I can't help rolling my eyes. I wonder if his family has a throne or title or hundreds of billions of property waiting for his children to inherit.
It takes a lot of money, time and energy to raise a child. If couples have children, but they don't have the patience, energy and love to raise them, how pitiful the children are, and they may become social pests in the future. People who choose Dink must have self-knowledge and know that they are not suitable for raising children, so they have to choose not to have children. This is a very responsible attitude towards life, how can it be said to be selfish?