Scientific research is to demonstrate with a negative attitude, so that there will be no wrong argumentation caused by bias and suggestion.

..........

His finger literacy experiment has not been recognized by the scientific community, because there is no supervisor at all. During the experiment, every child must be supervised in shifts for 24 hours, so that the children can't get any hints. Moreover, what they write, they can't write it themselves. It should be written casually by passers-by, sealed for children to touch.

Do you know what is most interesting about him? That is to say, there is no way to prove the existence of ability, and even after doing experiments, you still say that you can't prove it? How wonderful is it? His excuse is that sometimes he doesn't have this ability, sometimes he doesn't, and it takes several hours at a time. The more you try, the less likely you are to succeed. That's hilarious. He told people that it only took me 3 seconds to run 100 meter, but it was difficult to succeed in the test. As long as it is not successful, it is normal, and success is abnormal. Oh, my God, that's not nonsense. If you really run 100 meters, you can even blow it to the speed of light in a year. You won't let anyone test it anyway.

This is a fool's trick, not an argument. If I am allowed to make my own tools, I will get a closed box and make sure I can't see inside. After that, I will scribble in the box every time, let your so-called child with the highest spiritual power touch it, and give you 1000 chances to see if you can touch it. How dare he? Can an experiment that dares to demonstrate nothing but empty talk be called an experiment? People like him are a disgrace to the scientific community.