Let's take another look. The first picture is the same as the second eagle spreading its wings, but the difference is that the first eagle is taking off, which can be seen from the dead branches under its sharp claws. Lack of momentum, monotonous background and no artistic conception. Moreover, eagles are usually proud of their fierce eyes. In this picture, there is almost no media to communicate with the audience. It can be said that there is nothing to see, which makes the whole picture look dull.
Although the second picture is landing, it is a bit vague, and besides sharp eyes, it is not prey, like falling, which makes it lack of appreciation and unworthy of the name of the king of the sky. At the same time, it does not reflect the biting nature of the eagle, which runs counter to its absolute field of regarding the prey under its claws as a plaything in the palm of its hand. 、
However, in the third picture, we can see that at first glance, it can be said to be bland and motionless, and even thought it was an ordinary eagle, but when we look closely, it is not. This eagle seems to have some vicissitudes of life and old age, because the former king has long been swallowed up by the years, his fairy feathers have withered, and his beak has left its youthful mark, engraved with unbeaten claws, which will make it.
This eagle, in particular, looks very confused, suspicious and surprising. Communication with the viewer is the soul of this work, and the eyes are the finishing touch. It seems that it has long understood people's sighs. Perhaps it is a deliberate convergence of momentum, or a lot of trouble. When time and glory coexist, strength and pride become confrontation, and glory obviously does not shine, but neither does the isolated and independent king's power.
What's more, with a pure hand, you actually adopted (づづ 3 づ)? ~