Recently, a new problem appeared in Chongqing 150 bowl of plum vegetables, that is, the home address provided by Mr. Shao, the plaintiff in this case, was not Mr. Shao's real home address, but the home address of an innocent female owner who had nothing to do with Mr. Shao. However, it is understandable that Mr. Shao dare not disclose his real address. After all, professional counterfeiters do have many potential dangers, and Mr. Shao should also worry about being killed.

First of all, we all know that many netizens are angry now. There have been many extreme cases before. There is news that a woman hurt an old man and refused to admit her mistake. As a result, many netizens found out the woman's home address and sent a lot of disgusting things to her family, and the woman was forced to move. Although the woman's behavior is wrong, the law will restrain and punish her, and netizens should not treat her too extreme.

Secondly, Mr. Shao in this case was originally a professional counterfeiter, and Mr. Shao did not shy away from his identity. However, this counterfeiting case was considered by many people as malicious extortion, and many netizens didn't like Mr. Shao's behavior very much. So after the address provided by Mr. Shao was disclosed, many netizens began to express their intention to go? Will it? What Mr. Shao said.

Finally, Mr. Shao has been doing this for a long time. He naturally knows that professional counterfeiters are vulnerable to retaliation, and it is understandable that he dare not provide his real address. However, Mr. Shao's behavior is not allowed by law. Mr. Shao's behavior is to make the real owners innocent, and it is really excessive to drag others into the water in order to protect themselves.