Current location - Health Preservation Learning Network - Healthy weight loss - Is it reasonable to add points to lose weight in the college entrance examination? Why?
Is it reasonable to add points to lose weight in the college entrance examination? Why?
China Youth Daily reported that five national bonus items, which have been popular for 30 years, will soon disappear from 20 15. The other five local bonus points will also come to an end after 20 15. It indicates that the extra points in the college entrance examination will usher in greater slimming. However, as of June 22nd, * * *11"211"universities announced 20 15 undergraduate enrollment regulations.

These universities have three attitudes. According to statistics, ***30 colleges and universities fully recognize the policy of adding points to college entrance examinations in various places, not only recognizing the scores formed after adding points, but also taking this score as the basis for arranging majors; 57 colleges and universities recognize the college entrance examination plus points at least in the filing stage. Among them, 29 colleges and universities are based on the actual test scores when assigning majors, and 28 colleges and universities have not explained the admission of majors.

We can't let colleges and universities talk to themselves.

Liu Changhai (Teacher): The reason why the extra points in the college entrance examination are controversial is not because there are mistakes in the policy of extra points in the college entrance examination, but because there are deviations in the implementation level. First, there has been "extra fraud" or even "extra corruption"; Second, it triggered "extra points education" and increased the burden on students. It is for the above reasons that the state has issued regulations to reduce and standardize the extra points in the college entrance examination.

In this case, we have reason to believe that the standardized bonus points are neither obtained by corruption nor by "bonus education", which should be said to be scientific and reasonable. Then, every university should admit that such extra points in the college entrance examination are fair to candidates and respect the national extra points policy. If colleges and universities talk to themselves or even have ambiguous attitudes, it will undoubtedly increase the contingency and randomness in the process of enrollment, and it is likely to increase the space for personal operation.

To "slim down", we must "clean up"

Zhang Xiliu (Civil Servant): 1 1 The attitude of key universities towards adding points to the college entrance examination is "various". It can be seen that the "slimming" of the college entrance examination has encountered the "soft resistance" of colleges and universities. In other words, without special legal norms, it is not feasible to rely solely on the "slimming" opinions of several departments.

Therefore, to standardize the extra points in the college entrance examination, it is necessary to "slim down" and "clean up". First of all, it is necessary to supervise and regulate candidates and parents to treat the college entrance examination honestly and crack down on illegal acts involving the college entrance examination. At the same time, it is necessary to formulate a comprehensive law for the college entrance examination, comprehensively and meticulously regulate the proposition, examination and admission of the college entrance examination, and reduce the occurrence of cheating and unfair events. For example, for the policy of adding points to the college entrance examination, a hearing system can be implemented to invite students, parents, teachers and the media to participate, so as to make the college entrance examination extra points open and transparent and strengthen social supervision.

It is better to change to classified enrollment.

Liu Yunxi (Professor in University): The fundamental solution is to completely cancel the policy of adding points to the college entrance examination. No matter what the candidates are, they will not add points. So, how to reflect the policy concern for ethnic minorities? How to encourage all kinds of outstanding students such as winning the Olympic Games? Guide students to develop their personalities and cultivate their specialties?

To this end, the author suggests that the existing college entrance examination plus points policy should be changed to classified enrollment, so as to prevent unfair extra points and operational problems. Specifically, minority candidates can set up minority classes and enroll students separately, which is different from Han candidates. The Ministry of Education determines the national enrollment quota for ethnic minorities, and distributes it to directly affiliated universities and provinces and cities for implementation, and then the provinces and cities distribute the enrollment quota for ethnic minorities to relevant universities. It does not affect the Han candidates, but also takes care of the interests of minority candidates, which is conducive to the development of education in minority areas. For the winning candidates such as the Olympic Games, the extra points will be cancelled, and they will be strictly examined as special students with reference to the art enrollment method and recruited separately.

The reform of bonus points is not a simple "slimming"

Wang (media person): With the further development of economy and society, the college entrance examination is no longer fixed for life, the talents needed by society are more and more diversified, and more employers are no longer "only looking at prestigious schools". Therefore, the college entrance examination plus points system must be transformed into a practical direction. The so-called tangible means that the candidates themselves have visible, tangible, popular and lasting "political achievements" and can be recognized by the public through necessary procedures; Practicality means that the items that require extra points often reflect candidates' high moral quality, strong innovation ability, great social contribution, sufficient stamina and broad prospects.

At present, the public is looking forward to the reform of the college entrance examination, not its simple slimming. As long as the procedure is fair, it is not a scourge to add points to the college entrance examination. It is suggested that the education department can face the social hearing and demonstration, and on this basis, introduce a new college entrance examination plus points system and open and transparent operating norms that adapt to the development situation, and then show it to the public, and carry out reforms every few years, so that the college entrance examination plus points system will have a sustained and vigorous vitality, so that the groups that really need policy favors can bathe in sunshine care and let more talents stand out.