Xpro 1-xe1-XM1-xa1,it can be seen that Fuji is the final integrity of a product-the integrated xpro1gradually reduces the process of product subtraction, in order to make the product more close to the people.
The main difference between the two cameras is the sensor:
1 and X-A 1 did not use fuji's X-Trans sensor.
2. The sharpness of x-trans cmos without low-pass is much higher than that of traditional bayer array.
3.X-M 1 is better than xpro in shooting video, but the film effect is less in taking pictures.
In a word: X-M 1 exists as a simplified viewfinder version of X-E 1, and X-A 1 cannot reflect the strong color of Fuji at all. Weighing X-A 1 and X-M 1, the layout operation is similar, but X-M 1 is obviously more similar. So X-M 1 is relatively better in any way.
Extended data:
Functional differences between Fuji X-M 1 and Fuji X-E 1;
First of all, the biggest change is the view frame. Xpro 1 to xe 1 is from mixed viewing to electronic viewing. In order to control the size of the fuselage, the newly launched xm 1 simply canceled the view frame and upgraded the screen.
The screen of xm 1 has not only changed from 2.8 of xe 1 to 3.0, but the biggest change is that the screen pixels have been improved, from 460,000 pixels to 920,000 pixels. Although there is still a gap with the SLR's million screens, Fuji's screens have always been known for their exquisiteness, and xm 1 has performed very well.
In addition, the screen of xm 1 is a flip screen. The electronic framing of xe 1 can only be said to be a work, only for people who are used to framing an object, which is quite different from the mixed framing of pro 1. In fact, it is inevitable to cancel the view frame on xm 1.
Secondly, it is the difference in use function. Xm 1 cancels the shutter speed dial, which has a great influence on the convenience of use. This is not a big problem at ordinary times, and it is easy to catch up at a critical moment.