The government shoulders an important historical mission in promoting the revitalization of the old industrial base. The key to promoting the reform of administrative management system is to transform government functions, effectively play the role of the government and improve the administrative ability of the government. However, in order to give full play to the role of the government, we must speed up the reform of the government system. Because the northeast old industrial base is the earliest area to enter and the latest area to withdraw, it is also the most thorough area to implement the planned economy. At present, the biggest problem of the old industrial base is deeply influenced by the traditional planned economic system, and the system reform is relatively backward, especially the government reform and the state-owned enterprise reform. Therefore, to revitalize the old industrial base, we must first strengthen institutional innovation and eliminate institutional obstacles. Only by accelerating the government's own reform, better positioning its role and changing its functions can the government's administrative ability be improved. At the beginning of the last round of revitalization, China just joined the WTO. At that time, people were talking about the government's entry into WTO, because almost all WTO rules regulated the government. When we talk about entering the market here, there is also a question of the government entering the market, because the market economy requires the adjustment and standardization of the government's administrative functions with the goal of establishing and perfecting the market system. In recent years, governments at all levels in Northeast China have strengthened their social management and public service functions, and actively changed from all-round and supervision to management, service and rule of law. Many positive changes have taken place in government functions and great achievements have been made. First, some progress has been made in the cultivation, standardization and supervision of the market system. On the basis of continuous development of commodity markets, we will gradually cultivate factor markets and strive to establish a unified, open and competitive market system. The basic role of the market in resource allocation is becoming more and more important. Second, major steps have been taken to separate government from enterprise. Government departments have lifted their administrative affiliation with directly affiliated economic entities and enterprises, and no longer directly manage enterprises. The third is to gradually move closer to international practice in foreign-related economic management. Fourth, the government's function of promoting coordinated economic and social development has been strengthened. Fifth, the government has made some progress in its own reform, established the general plan of governing the province and administration according to law, put forward the goal of building a clean, diligent, pragmatic and efficient government and worked hard to implement it. The reform of government institutions has been gradually deepened, and the process of political democratization has been continuously promoted. Generally speaking, the reform of government system still lags behind the process of economic system transition, and the transformation of government functions is slower than the requirements of market economy development. There are still a series of deep-seated contradictions to be solved in the relationship between government and enterprises, government and market, and government and society. The problems existing in the administrative management system have become the bottleneck restricting the economic and social development and affecting the implementation of the revitalization policy. Specifically, it is "three strong and three weak": strong government and weak enterprise government still interfere too much in micro-subjects, especially state-owned enterprises, and an effective state-owned assets management system has not yet been formed, and the confusion between the government's public management function and the state-owned assets owner's function has not fundamentally changed. The government has the dual functions of referee and athlete, covering the management and operation of enterprises. The government is not completely divorced from enterprise activities, and administrative intervention still exists in some areas, such as administrative control, supporting state-owned enterprises through tax rebates and interest subsidies. The administrative examination and approval system formed during the planned economy period and expanded during the economic transition period still exists widely, especially in the fields of enterprise establishment, appointment and removal of leaders, investment, foreign trade and so on. In the process of promoting the reform of state-owned enterprises, the implementation of some policies has also produced side effects of strengthening administrative examination and approval and case handling. In the asset reorganization activities of state-owned enterprises, such as shareholding system reform, stock issuance, merger and reorganization, some departments and local governments often conduct inappropriate administrative intervention on enterprises out of departmental interests, local interests and even the will of the chief executive. Support state-owned enterprises by means of financial return and interest subsidy, rather than by means of state-owned capital investment and operation. Forcibly require enterprises with good efficiency to take care of inferior enterprises in investment, secured loans and asset restructuring. And even apportion government administrative expenses to enterprises. Enterprise cadres and government cadres have the same administrative level and can communicate with each other. As a microeconomic cell, state-owned enterprises undertake a large number of social affairs, and enterprises are eager to slim down, overwhelmed and unable to cope with fierce market competition. State-owned enterprises are dominant and private enterprises are seriously weak. There are still too many restrictions on the non-public sector of the economy, and the environment for fair competition has not yet formed. As a result of strong government and weak enterprises, the government, enterprises and people are all in trouble: state-owned enterprises are increasingly in trouble because of unresolved system contradictions, low degree of marketization and insufficient development vitality. However, private enterprises have never grown up, resulting in a large number of laid-off workers can not be resettled, and the local economy is hard to see improvement. Strong government and weak market have long been accustomed to top-down administrative power management, with the habit of mandatory preference and administrative orders to intervene in the economy, lacking the concept of modern market management. Without really understanding and believing in the role of market mechanism, they still blindly believe in administrative power and adhere to administrative leadership, preferring to directly organize the production and business activities of enterprises, directly organize investment attraction and project implementation, directly issue mandatory economic indicators and product indicators, and directly intervene in economic life through administrative orders. Where the market can play a role, government administrative intervention is the most concentrated; Where the market fails, it is the blind spot of government management. Regional economic development is in a state of "human intervention", from attracting foreign investment (investment has become the main task of the government) and promoting joint ventures, to launching projects, starting new enterprises and even holding exhibitions and economic and trade negotiations, all of which are presided over and promoted by the government. In the field of investment and financing, there is a tendency for the government to directly intervene in micro-investment and financing activities to achieve macro-control objectives, which often fails to achieve the expected purpose of macro-control, and at the same time strengthens the abnormal intervention of the government in investment and financing activities. Many departments and local governments still assume the functions of investment and financing subjects too much, spend a lot of energy to compete for funds and projects, and investment decisions depend on the approval of administrative organs at all levels, without following scientific and rigorous market-oriented investment decision-making procedures and lacking strict investment risk responsibility mechanism, which often leads to major investment mistakes. The government has become the main body of resource allocation, and the role played by the market mechanism is too small or not. The entrepreneur said: "The northeast gives the impression to the outside world that it is a government-led market, not an entrepreneur's market." Many things that should not be done by the government are being done by the government, but some things that should be done by the government are not done enough or not because of lack of energy and financial resources. In terms of market supervision, on the one hand, the laws and regulations regulating market order are not perfect, the laws and regulations are not uniform and transparent, and the system of management according to law is still far from perfect, and there are still many gaps. Legislation lags behind reality, and law enforcement lags behind legislation. There is a lack of strong supervision and restriction on acts that fail to comply with the law, are lax in law enforcement or even violate the law. The phenomenon that the rule of man is greater than the rule of law occurs from time to time in many places, which seriously damages judicial independence and judicial justice. There are contradictions between the laws and regulations of departments and local governments and even internal documents and national laws. In the practice of administrative law enforcement, the authority of internal documents is greater than departmental laws and regulations, and the authority of departmental laws and regulations is greater than national laws. On the other hand, local protectionism and departmental division are constantly changing their methods, which hinders the formation of a regional unified market. These factors lead to a relatively chaotic market order, which is manifested in the proliferation of counterfeit and shoddy goods, rampant tax evasion, foreign exchange fraud and smuggling, chaotic social credit relations, widespread debt evasion, fraud in the construction field, and poor engineering quality. This concept of "people ruling the economy" and "imperative" management mode are no longer suitable for the diversified market economic structure. Strong government and weak society From the perspective of the relationship between government and society, the government covers most social affairs, social governance is underdeveloped, government decentralization is not enough, and intermediaries are attached to government departments, which makes intermediaries almost different, and social intermediary organizations that truly meet the requirements of market economy development have not been fully developed. In the process of exercising its functions, the government has problems of offside, absence and dislocation. "Offside" refers to the direct management of economic affairs by the government; "Absence" means that the government's public service function has not been fully exerted; "Dislocation" means that the government is busy with micro-affairs and the macro-planning is weak. On the relationship between the government and the intermediary organizations, on the one hand, it is not enough to cultivate and play its role, on the other hand, it is not enough to supervise them according to law. The transformation of scientific research units is stagnant, the reform of public institutions is lagging behind, and a large number of administrative functions are performed; It is often a very large commission, office and bureau, with several or even a dozen institutions. Therefore, the administrative system of the old industrial base is mainly characterized by prominent functional dislocation. The main manifestations are: there is no distinction between government and capital, government and enterprises, politics and affairs, politics and society. The backwardness of Northeast China is a kind of institutional backwardness. On the surface, the gap between the northeast and the southern coastal areas is the gap of economic development level, but in essence it is the contrast of systems. It is imperative to reform the administrative system in Northeast China.