Recently, in Ledong, Hainan, an old man was cooking in the open air, and the smoke generated may pollute the surrounding plants and environment, so some relevant leaders fined 600 yuan for the old man. After the incident was exposed on the Internet, it immediately attracted a lot of public opinion. Everyone thinks that the fine for this incident is unreasonable, and some even say that this behavior is particularly absurd. Soon, local leaders also responded to this matter.

Local leaders said that the notice circulated on the Internet was indeed true. At the time of the incident, our law enforcement officers did not control the relevant policies in place, so the handling of this was flawed, and the fines were not released by the elderly. Finally, 600 yuan was fined by the village committee.

Netizens who saw this scene were also difficult to calm down: "Is this also a penalty? This behavior is obviously using chicken feathers as arrows. If this behavior will be fined, will it be impossible to go hiking and barbecue in the wild in the future? Isn't the impact of barbecue on the surrounding environment greater than cooking? "

"These people really take bullying and fear of evil to a new level. To tell the truth, such a rule is really unreasonable. Which leader came up with a fine for such a thing? Can you expose him and let us see what kind of person he is? "

"Many families in rural areas cook outside. It is better to say that smoking outside affects the environment than cooking outside."

Cooking with fire will cause a lot of pollution. In some poor mountainous areas and villages, people may still burn the wood left by their ancestors to make a fire. Of course, advocating environmental protection, energy conservation and emission reduction is a good thing in itself. The process of promoting energy conservation and environmental protection policies in rural areas should be improved and changed through assistance, provided that the actual living conditions of villagers are taken into account, and they should not be burdened, let alone forcibly punished by violence.

The local leaders responded that 600 yuan's fine was not collected from the elderly in the end, but was borne by the village committee and village cadres. It is not who bears the problem, but the fine should not be punished in the first place. Just like putting pressure on village committees and cadres, this law enforcement method is unpopular and should be adjusted and reflected.

What did you say?/Sorry?